Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

DetAug introduces a novel training-time augmentation strategy that enables robotic policies to navigate obstacles during inference without requiring any obstacle data in the training set. By treating augmentation parameters as conditioning labels, the method achieves significantly higher collision-free success rates on benchmarks while maintaining flexibility that inference-time steering lacks. This advancement addresses a critical gap in transferring free-space teleoperated datasets to complex, unstructured environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

DetAug: Obstacle-Blind Trajectory Augmentation for Zero-shot Obstacle Avoidance

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.18395v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Policies for robotic manipulation are produced by training on large teleoperated datasets. These datasets typically consist of free-space trajectories, making them difficult to transfer to test-time environments with obstacles. Previous methods for closing this gap have largely fallen into two groups. Dataset augmentation addresses it at training time but needs obstacle geometry in advance, whereas steering an existing checkpoint at inference time avoids that requirement but is limited in flexibility. Our method draws from both areas without inheriting either drawback. DetAug applies an obstacle-blind augmentation scheme to the transit phases of a free-space dataset, leaving object interactions untouched, and records the augmentation parameters as an explicit conditioning label. At inference it samples a batch of labels and executes the trajectory with the lowest collision cost. On the SafeLIBERO benchmark DetAug achieves a collision-free success rate more than 20pp above the next best method, and selecting over the label space outperforms guidance on the same policy by 26pp. On real hardware, inference-time steering methods collapse on tasks requiring large detours, while DetAug matches or exceeds an obstacle-conditioned baseline without ever seeing obstacles in training.

Abstract:Policies for robotic manipulation are produced by training on large teleoperated datasets. These datasets typically consist of free-space trajectories, making them difficult to transfer to test-time environments with obstacles. Previous methods for closing this gap have largely fallen into two groups. Dataset augmentation addresses it at training time but needs obstacle geometry in advance, whereas steering an existing checkpoint at inference time avoids that requirement but is limited in flexibility. Our method draws from both areas without inheriting either drawback. DetAug applies an obstacle-blind augmentation scheme to the transit phases of a free-space dataset, leaving object interactions untouched, and records the augmentation parameters as an explicit conditioning label. At inference it samples a batch of labels and executes the trajectory with the lowest collision cost. On the SafeLIBERO benchmark DetAug achieves a collision-free success rate more than 20pp above the next best method, and selecting over the label space outperforms guidance on the same policy by 26pp. On real hardware, inference-time steering methods collapse on tasks requiring large detours, while DetAug matches or exceeds an obstacle-conditioned baseline without ever seeing obstacles in training.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.18395 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.18395v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18395 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 276 words

Related coverage