Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates how textual interface architectures influence automatic prompt optimization within audio-visual question answering systems, comparing direct inference against captioner-reasoner and agentic designs. The study finds that while simpler direct systems yield immediate model-dependent gains, more complex multi-agent interfaces offer better interpretability at the cost of optimization difficulty. These findings provide a critical framework for developers seeking to balance performance and explainability when deploying multimodal reasoning pipelines.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Designing Textual Interfaces To Enhance Llm Reasoning On Audio-Visual Question Answering

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.20085v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic prompt optimization (APO) has shown strong effectiveness for text-based LLMs and LLM systems, but its application to audio-visual understanding systems requires suitable textual interfaces through which multimodal reasoning can be exposed to text-based optimizers. We investigate how the design of textual interfaces affects prompt optimization for multimodal reasoning, on the audio-visual question answering task. We compare three interface designs, including a direct inference system consisting of a single omni-modal large language model (OmniLLM), a captioner-reasoner system, and an agentic architecture in which a primary agent orchestrates subagent OmniLLMs. Experiments with Qwen3-Omni and Gemini show that direct prompt optimization provides model-dependent gains; the captioner-reasoner system and the agentic system expose more interpretable optimization interfaces but are harder to optimize, where error analysis of cases affected by optimization is conducted. Our study highlights textual interface design as an important factor in making prompt optimization effective for omni-modal reasoning systems. Our implementation details are specified in GitHub repo.

Abstract:Automatic prompt optimization (APO) has shown strong effectiveness for text-based LLMs and LLM systems, but its application to audio-visual understanding systems requires suitable textual interfaces through which multimodal reasoning can be exposed to text-based optimizers. We investigate how the design of textual interfaces affects prompt optimization for multimodal reasoning, on the audio-visual question answering task. We compare three interface designs, including a direct inference system consisting of a single omni-modal large language model (OmniLLM), a captioner-reasoner system, and an agentic architecture in which a primary agent orchestrates subagent OmniLLMs. Experiments with Qwen3-Omni and Gemini show that direct prompt optimization provides model-dependent gains; the captioner-reasoner system and the agentic system expose more interpretable optimization interfaces but are harder to optimize, where error analysis of cases affected by optimization is conducted. Our study highlights textual interface design as an important factor in making prompt optimization effective for omni-modal reasoning systems. Our implementation details are specified in GitHub repo.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)

arXiv:2610.20085 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.20085v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20085 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 259 words

Related coverage