Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This research presents a novel experimental methodology for inducing controlled task-induced arousal in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) studies without halting user engagement. By combining digital pacing tasks with physical challenges, the authors demonstrate a repeatable protocol that effectively elevates physiological stress markers like GSR and grip variability while maintaining interaction continuity. This tool offers researchers a standardized way to simulate high-stress scenarios for evaluating system robustness under realistic, interactive conditions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Designing Task-Induced Arousal: A Multimodal Stress Induction Method for Interactive Experiments

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.26156v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: HCI and HRI studies often require short, repeatable arousal manipulations that can run while participants continue interacting with a device or robot. These experiments are often challenged by the need to induce arousal in settings that still resemble real interaction. Participants must continue using a device, touching a robot, or producing sensor data while the manipulation unfolds. We aimed to develop a compact and repeatable way to induce controlled task-related arousal during interactive experiments by combining a lightweight browser-based pacing task, escalating timing demands and urgency cues, and a concurrent physical hotwire-style challenge. In an A-B-A within-participant study, the induction condition significantly increased mental demand, temporal demand, effort, frustration, and SAM arousal (all p < .001), while perceived performance decreased (p < .001). GSR peak rate increased relative to both calm conditions (p = .030) and escalated over time (p < .001). Grip variability also increased (p = .036), as did release speed (both p < .001), while valence remained above the scale midpoint. These results provide initial evidence that the combined procedure induces controlled, relatively high-valence task-related arousal and may serve as a reusable experimental tool for future human-computer and human-robot interaction studies.

Abstract:HCI and HRI studies often require short, repeatable arousal manipulations that can run while participants continue interacting with a device or robot. These experiments are often challenged by the need to induce arousal in settings that still resemble real interaction. Participants must continue using a device, touching a robot, or producing sensor data while the manipulation unfolds. We aimed to develop a compact and repeatable way to induce controlled task-related arousal during interactive experiments by combining a lightweight browser-based pacing task, escalating timing demands and urgency cues, and a concurrent physical hotwire-style challenge. In an A-B-A within-participant study, the induction condition significantly increased mental demand, temporal demand, effort, frustration, and SAM arousal (all p < .001), while perceived performance decreased (p < .001). GSR peak rate increased relative to both calm conditions (p = .030) and escalated over time (p < .001). Grip variability also increased (p = .036), as did release speed (both p < .001), while valence remained above the scale midpoint. These results provide initial evidence that the combined procedure induces controlled, relatively high-valence task-related arousal and may serve as a reusable experimental tool for future human-computer and human-robot interaction studies.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.26156 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2609.26156v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26156 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 290 words

Related coverage