Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses critical limitations in Large Language Model-based task planning for general-purpose service robots, specifically targeting context bloat and reliability issues inherent in single-prompt approaches. By introducing an LLM chaining architecture that decouples instruction classification from action generation, the study achieves significant efficiency gains while highlighting that execution-layer failures remain a primary bottleneck even when planning is successful. The work provides essential insights into optimizing AI-driven robotic autonomy for real-world home environments, distinguishing between algorithmic planning success and physical task completion rates.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Design and Evaluation of LLM Chaining-Based Task Planning for General Purpose Service Robots

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.29043v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: General Purpose Service Robot (GPSR) tasks, as defined in the RoboCup@Home benchmark, require robots to interpret diverse natural language commands and generate multi-step action sequences in real home environments. Conventional Single Prompt (SP) approaches suffer from context bloat and the "Lost in the Middle" phenomenon, leading to unreliable task planning. We propose an LLM chaining architecture that separates instruction classification and action generation into two specialized stages, reducing per-inference prompt length by approximately 45% while improving planning consistency. We evaluate our method using 100 randomly generated GPSR commands across three language models spanning local open-source and frontier cloud deployment contexts. Results show consistent planning improvements over SP across all models, with gains of up to +37 percentage points on local models. Further, real-robot execution experiments on the Toyota Human Support Robot (HSR) reveal that planning success alone does not guarantee task completion, with 6 of 10 tasks completing successfully and execution-layer failures identified as the primary remaining bottleneck.

Abstract:General Purpose Service Robot (GPSR) tasks, as defined in the RoboCup@Home benchmark, require robots to interpret diverse natural language commands and generate multi-step action sequences in real home environments. Conventional Single Prompt (SP) approaches suffer from context bloat and the "Lost in the Middle" phenomenon, leading to unreliable task planning. We propose an LLM chaining architecture that separates instruction classification and action generation into two specialized stages, reducing per-inference prompt length by approximately 45% while improving planning consistency. We evaluate our method using 100 randomly generated GPSR commands across three language models spanning local open-source and frontier cloud deployment contexts. Results show consistent planning improvements over SP across all models, with gains of up to +37 percentage points on local models. Further, real-robot execution experiments on the Toyota Human Support Robot (HSR) reveal that planning success alone does not guarantee task completion, with 6 of 10 tasks completing successfully and execution-layer failures identified as the primary remaining bottleneck.

Accepted to IEEE GCCE 2026. 5 pages, 6 figures, 3 tables

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.29043 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.29043v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29043 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words

Related coverage