aiqbench analysis
DeReAct introduces a modular architecture that decouples action authorization from task completion in ReAct-based agents, addressing critical reliability issues like error propagation and unsupported claims. By externalizing a Critic policy to validate actions and a Context Manager to certify state, the method significantly boosts performance on weaker models while maintaining strong grounding for advanced ones. This research advances the safety and robustness of autonomous AI agents by enforcing stricter constraints before execution.
DeReAct: Decomposed Reasoning and Acting for Reliable AI Agents
arXiv:2610.02351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate execution. We introduce DeReAct, a modular agent architecture that externalizes two gating policies: a Critic that validates proposed actions before execution, and a Context Manager that reconstructs an environment-supported \textsc{State} and certifies task completion. Across GAIA and SWE-bench Verified, DeReAct improves Pass@1 most for weaker Brain models, with gains of 6.5--7.0 points for Qwen3-Coder-480B and 4.2--5.2 points for Claude Sonnet~4.5; gains diminish as Brain capability increases. Trajectory and ablation analyses show that external gating is effective when targeted failures are sufficiently prevalent and the gating policy is itself sufficient. With Claude Opus~4.5, Pass@1 remains comparable to ReAct, while DeReAct produces more evidence-complete and constraint-satisfying trajectories, indicating that completion control can trade earlier termination for stronger grounding. Overall, DeReAct improves weaker agents while retaining grounding benefits as models strengthen.
Abstract:ReAct-based agents typically rely on a single LLM policy to propose actions, interact with the environment, and decide when a task is complete. This coupling makes action authorization and completion control difficult to enforce independently, allowing errors to propagate and unsupported completion claims to terminate execution. We introduce DeReAct, a modular agent architecture that externalizes two gating policies: a Critic that validates proposed actions before execution, and a Context Manager that reconstructs an environment-supported \textsc{State} and certifies task completion. Across GAIA and SWE-bench Verified, DeReAct improves Pass@1 most for weaker Brain models, with gains of 6.5--7.0 points for Qwen3-Coder-480B and 4.2--5.2 points for Claude Sonnet~4.5; gains diminish as Brain capability increases. Trajectory and ablation analyses show that external gating is effective when targeted failures are sufficiently prevalent and the gating policy is itself sufficient. With Claude Opus~4.5, Pass@1 remains comparable to ReAct, while DeReAct produces more evidence-complete and constraint-satisfying trajectories, indicating that completion control can trade earlier termination for stronger grounding. Overall, DeReAct improves weaker agents while retaining grounding benefits as models strengthen.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.02351 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.02351v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02351 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 18, 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026

Value Generalisation 1: a Research and Deployment Program
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 29, 2026