Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a first-order theory for the precision floor in deep neural networks, linking accuracy collapse directly to predictive amplification and residual scaling across diverse architectures. The study reveals a paradox where quantization-aware training improves shallow models but yields diminishing returns as depth increases, fundamentally altering the noise tolerance law. These findings provide critical theoretical bounds for deploying efficient low-bit-width models in large-scale systems without catastrophic performance degradation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Depth Laws for the Precision Floor of Trained Neural Networks: Amplification, Residual Scaling, and a Quantization-Aware Training Paradox

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.32060v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How many bits does a network need before its accuracy collapses, and how does this grow with depth? We study the precision floor, the perturbation level or bit-width at which accuracy falls halfway to chance, in MLPs, CNNs, Vision Transformers and nine pretrained language models, under post-training quantization (PTQ) and quantization- or noise-aware training (QAT). (i) A first-order theory sets the floor through one full-precision quantity, the predictive amplification $G$: $\eta_c=\Lambda/G$, and $G^2$ grows linearly in depth at a rate proportional to the squared residual branch scale. (ii) The predicted equality $\alpha_{PTQ}=\rho$ of depth exponents holds within 95% intervals in twelve of thirteen trained architectures and in GPT-2 from 12 to 48 layers, with $\Lambda=1.45\pm14\%$ across trained architectures. (iii) Residual branches scaled by $1/\sqrt{D}$ and pre-normalisation remove the depth penalty, and each quantizer turns noise into bits at a rate fixed by its step rule, giving $b_c=(\alpha/\gamma)\log_2 D+C$. (iv) A QAT paradox: noise-aware training roughly doubles the tolerable noise of shallow networks, but the gain decays with depth, so the depth law steepens ($\alpha_{QAT}/\alpha_{PTQ}=1.45$-$1.47$ on two datasets, ten seeds each). Decision margins, cross-layer error cancellation and heavy tails do not set the floor.

Abstract:How many bits does a network need before its accuracy collapses, and how does this grow with depth? We study the precision floor, the perturbation level or bit-width at which accuracy falls halfway to chance, in MLPs, CNNs, Vision Transformers and nine pretrained language models, under post-training quantization (PTQ) and quantization- or noise-aware training (QAT). (i) A first-order theory sets the floor through one full-precision quantity, the predictive amplification $G$: $\eta_c=\Lambda/G$, and $G^2$ grows linearly in depth at a rate proportional to the squared residual branch scale. (ii) The predicted equality $\alpha_{PTQ}=\rho$ of depth exponents holds within 95% intervals in twelve of thirteen trained architectures and in GPT-2 from 12 to 48 layers, with $\Lambda=1.45\pm14\%$ across trained architectures. (iii) Residual branches scaled by $1/\sqrt{D}$ and pre-normalisation remove the depth penalty, and each quantizer turns noise into bits at a rate fixed by its step rule, giving $b_c=(\alpha/\gamma)\log_2 D+C$. (iv) A QAT paradox: noise-aware training roughly doubles the tolerable noise of shallow networks, but the gain decays with depth, so the depth law steepens ($\alpha_{QAT}/\alpha_{PTQ}=1.45$-$1.47$ on two datasets, ten seeds each). Decision margins, cross-layer error cancellation and heavy tails do not set the floor.

27 pages, 9 figures, 6 tables. Code: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.32060 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.32060v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32060 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words

Related coverage