Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a critical evaluation of model architectures for dependency parsing, revealing that simpler Biaffine LSTMs outperform complex transformers in low-resource African languages until sufficient training data is available. The findings highlight morphological complexity as a key factor influencing architectural choice, offering practical guidance for developing syntactic tools in under-resourced regimes.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Dependency Parsing Across the Resource Spectrum: Evaluating Architectures on High and Low-Resource Languages

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.02608v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Transformer-based models achieve state-of-the-art dependency parsing for high-resource languages, yet their advantage over simpler architectures in low-resource settings remains poorly understood. We evaluate four parsers---the Biaffine LSTM, Stack-Pointer Network, AfroXLMR-large, and RemBERT---across twelve typologically diverse languages, with a focus on low-resource African languages. We find that the Biaffine LSTM consistently outperforms transformer models in low-resource regimes, with transformers recovering their advantage as training data increases. The crossover falls within a resource range typical of treebanks for under-resourced languages. Morphological complexity (measured via MATTR) emerges as a significant secondary predictor of transformers' relative disadvantage after controlling for corpus size. These results indicate that the Biaffine LSTM may be better suited for syntactic tool development in low-resource regimes until sufficient annotated data is available to leverage the representational capacity of pre-trained transformers.

Abstract:Transformer-based models achieve state-of-the-art dependency parsing for high-resource languages, yet their advantage over simpler architectures in low-resource settings remains poorly understood. We evaluate four parsers---the Biaffine LSTM, Stack-Pointer Network, AfroXLMR-large, and RemBERT---across twelve typologically diverse languages, with a focus on low-resource African languages. We find that the Biaffine LSTM consistently outperforms transformer models in low-resource regimes, with transformers recovering their advantage as training data increases. The crossover falls within a resource range typical of treebanks for under-resourced languages. Morphological complexity (measured via MATTR) emerges as a significant secondary predictor of transformers' relative disadvantage after controlling for corpus size. These results indicate that the Biaffine LSTM may be better suited for syntactic tool development in low-resource regimes until sufficient annotated data is available to leverage the representational capacity of pre-trained transformers.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.02608 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.02608v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.02608 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words

Related coverage