aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel framework for evaluating "Delegation Intelligence" in AI agents, specifically isolating the ability to decide when and how to delegate tasks to search tools from other capabilities like retrieval accuracy. By constructing DelegSearchBench with disentangled evaluation protocols, the authors demonstrate that end-to-end answer scores are insufficient metrics for understanding deep-search competence in modern agent systems. This work advances machine learning by providing a reproducible methodology to diagnose specific sub-capabilities within complex AI workflows rather than relying on coupled performance measures.
Delegation Intelligence in Deep Search: A Controllable Framework for Disentangled Capability Diagnosis
arXiv:2607.23524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep search is becoming a core capability of modern agent systems, yet it is typically evaluated solely based on end-to-end answer accuracy. This coupled evaluation paradigm entangles retrieval quality, long-context comprehension, evidence verification, and tool-use decisions, making it difficult to determine whether a model truly knows when and how to delegate information seeking to search. To this end: (1) We formalize this meta-capability as Delegation Intelligence in deep search and decompose it into complementary dimensions-Search Decision-Making (recognizing information insufficiency and deciding whether, when, and how to search) and Information Synthesis and Verification (aggregating evidence from multiple sources, judging source reliability, and synthesizing information under noisy, potentially adversarial conditions). (2) To enable disentangled and reproducible measurement, we develop a controllable synthesis pipeline built on document-grounded reverse engineering. This yields a general recipe for constructing controlled deep-search evaluations rather than a single fixed dataset. (3) As a concrete instantiation, we construct DelegSearchBench, together with a disentangled evaluation protocol that isolates each capability dimension by varying document composition and tool access. (4) Across representative models, we demonstrate that deep-search competence cannot be adequately characterized by final-answer accuracy alone...
Abstract:Deep search is becoming a core capability of modern agent systems, yet it is typically evaluated solely based on end-to-end answer accuracy. This coupled evaluation paradigm entangles retrieval quality, long-context comprehension, evidence verification, and tool-use decisions, making it difficult to determine whether a model truly knows when and how to delegate information seeking to search. To this end: (1) We formalize this meta-capability as Delegation Intelligence in deep search and decompose it into complementary dimensions-Search Decision-Making (recognizing information insufficiency and deciding whether, when, and how to search) and Information Synthesis and Verification (aggregating evidence from multiple sources, judging source reliability, and synthesizing information under noisy, potentially adversarial conditions). (2) To enable disentangled and reproducible measurement, we develop a controllable synthesis pipeline built on document-grounded reverse engineering. This yields a general recipe for constructing controlled deep-search evaluations rather than a single fixed dataset. (3) As a concrete instantiation, we construct DelegSearchBench, together with a disentangled evaluation protocol that isolates each capability dimension by varying document composition and tool access. (4) Across representative models, we demonstrate that deep-search competence cannot be adequately characterized by final-answer accuracy alone...
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.23524 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.23524v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23524 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage
GitLab 19.4 release notes
GitLab · Sep 17, 2026

Agentic vision: Building visual intelligence with Amazon Bedrock and MCP servers
AWS · Jul 15, 2026

Skydio CEO Adam Bry on why Silicon Valley shouldn’t draw red lines for drone use
The Verge · Jun 15, 2026

How HPE Zerto built an agentic troubleshooting system with Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Sep 8, 2026