Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a compiler-level framework for certifying lattice-surgery operations on surface codes with irregular boundaries caused by hardware defects. By utilizing GF(2) row-space tests, the method effectively separates patch construction from the extraction of parity measurements, improving certification rates in clustered defect regimes. The work advances fault-tolerant quantum computing by enabling reliable logical operations on imperfect physical qubit layouts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Defect-Adaptive Lattice Surgery on Irregular Boundary Surface-Code Patches

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.25524v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Defect-adaptive surface-code methods construct valid logical patches on imperfect hardware, but fault-tolerant computation also requires certifying that requested logical operations remain executable on the resulting irregular geometries. We address this problem for lattice-surgery merges whose interfaces intersect deformed boundaries, unavailable checks, or gauge-inferred operators. Our compiler constructs an admissible seam-measurement set whose elements associate effective seam supports with raw-outcome selectors and schedule metadata. A GF(2) row-space test then determines whether the requested joint parity is realizable modulo pre-merge stabilizer constraints, returning either an explicit parity-extraction rule or a dual witness of non-realizability within the evaluated set. Paired ablations isolate the contribution of the proposed measurement-set construction rules. We further apply the test to configurations generated by Snakes and Ladders (SnL) on 15,000 clustered boundary-defect maps. Adding the proposed boundary-reconstruction rows increases the certification rate from 61.88\% to 62.79\%, with the gain concentrated in strongly clustered regimes. The framework therefore provides a compiler step that separates defect-adaptive patch construction from the certification and extraction of lattice-surgery parity measurements.

Abstract:Defect-adaptive surface-code methods construct valid logical patches on imperfect hardware, but fault-tolerant computation also requires certifying that requested logical operations remain executable on the resulting irregular geometries. We address this problem for lattice-surgery merges whose interfaces intersect deformed boundaries, unavailable checks, or gauge-inferred operators. Our compiler constructs an admissible seam-measurement set whose elements associate effective seam supports with raw-outcome selectors and schedule metadata. A GF(2) row-space test then determines whether the requested joint parity is realizable modulo pre-merge stabilizer constraints, returning either an explicit parity-extraction rule or a dual witness of non-realizability within the evaluated set. Paired ablations isolate the contribution of the proposed measurement-set construction rules. We further apply the test to configurations generated by Snakes and Ladders (SnL) on 15,000 clustered boundary-defect maps. Adding the proposed boundary-reconstruction rows increases the certification rate from 61.88\% to 62.79\%, with the gain concentrated in strongly clustered regimes. The framework therefore provides a compiler step that separates defect-adaptive patch construction from the certification and extraction of lattice-surgery parity measurements.

arXiv:2604.25524 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2604.25524v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.25524 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words

Related coverage