aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates how deep learning architectures, specifically CNNs and GNNs, can decode finger-specific motor intent from noisy sEMG signals in post-stroke patients. By optimizing model size through architecture search and knowledge distillation, the study enables compact inference suitable for embedded hardware devices. The work establishes a reproducible software pipeline that bridges clinical signal processing with practical neurorehabilitation applications.
Deep Neural Networks for Learning Intent from sEMG Signals to Support Hardware Devices for Post-Stroke Neurorehabilitation
arXiv:2609.09971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Finger-specific motor intent is a clinically meaningful control signal for post-stroke neurorehabilitation, where residual muscle activity may remain measurable despite weak or incomplete movement. We study five-finger multilabel intent decoding from impaired-arm high-density surface electromyography (sEMG) in PhysioMio, a bilateral longitudinal dataset collected from stroke patients. A common processing protocol aligns movement labels, applies 20--450 Hz Butterworth filtering and Symlet-4 wavelet denoising, segments overlapping 200 ms windows, and extracts twelve time- and frequency-domain descriptors per channel. Direct LSTM, CNN, and GNN baselines reveal complementary behavior: the LSTM attains the highest subset accuracy (0.545), whereas the GNN attains the highest macro F1 (0.706) and macro AUPRC (0.776). Architecture search then identifies CNN-Large as the strongest single-split CNN, with 0.593 subset accuracy and 0.714 macro F1, while CNN-Micro provides a compact architecture for embedded inference. To match a four-sensor hardware design, we retrain CNN-Micro using channels associated with ECRB, ECRL, FDS, and FDP and exclude the ground electrode from model input. Across five seeds, cross-channel knowledge distillation improves the four-channel student over direct training, reaching $0.5219 \pm 0.0114$ subset accuracy, $0.7612 \pm 0.0038$ finger accuracy, and $0.6095 \pm 0.0058$ macro F1. The selected 123K-parameter model accepts nine windows of 48 features and has been exported to ONNX. These results establish a reproducible software path from post-stroke sEMG to compact five-finger intent prediction for subsequent hardware-in-the-loop evaluation.
Abstract:Finger-specific motor intent is a clinically meaningful control signal for post-stroke neurorehabilitation, where residual muscle activity may remain measurable despite weak or incomplete movement. We study five-finger multilabel intent decoding from impaired-arm high-density surface electromyography (sEMG) in PhysioMio, a bilateral longitudinal dataset collected from stroke patients. A common processing protocol aligns movement labels, applies 20--450 Hz Butterworth filtering and Symlet-4 wavelet denoising, segments overlapping 200 ms windows, and extracts twelve time- and frequency-domain descriptors per channel. Direct LSTM, CNN, and GNN baselines reveal complementary behavior: the LSTM attains the highest subset accuracy (0.545), whereas the GNN attains the highest macro F1 (0.706) and macro AUPRC (0.776). Architecture search then identifies CNN-Large as the strongest single-split CNN, with 0.593 subset accuracy and 0.714 macro F1, while CNN-Micro provides a compact architecture for embedded inference. To match a four-sensor hardware design, we retrain CNN-Micro using channels associated with ECRB, ECRL, FDS, and FDP and exclude the ground electrode from model input. Across five seeds, cross-channel knowledge distillation improves the four-channel student over direct training, reaching $0.5219 \pm 0.0114$ subset accuracy, $0.7612 \pm 0.0038$ finger accuracy, and $0.6095 \pm 0.0058$ macro F1. The selected 123K-parameter model accepts nine windows of 48 features and has been exported to ONNX. These results establish a reproducible software path from post-stroke sEMG to compact five-finger intent prediction for subsequent hardware-in-the-loop evaluation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.09971 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.09971v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09971 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words
Related coverage
Real-Time sEMG-Based Telecontrol of an Assistive Robotic Arm Using a 1D Convolutional Neural Network
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026

Award-Winning Researcher Trains Robots to Make Educated Guesses
IEEE Spectrum · Jun 12, 2026

Exploring Hierarchical Interest Representation For Meta Ads Deep Funnel Optimization
Meta Engineering · Jul 15, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026