Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using deep learning architectures like GoogLeNet and AlexNet to automate body composition analysis from CT scans in colorectal cancer patients. By achieving low mean percentage errors, these models offer a practical solution to reduce reliance on labor-intensive manual segmentation while maintaining clinical accuracy. The results suggest that integrating such automated tools into existing workflows could significantly streamline nutritional assessment for oncology care.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Deep learning-based computed tomography (CT) derived body composition classifier for colorectal cancer patients

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.15712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: Accurate body composition analysis using Computed Tomography (CT) scans is essential for assessing skeletal muscle area (SMA) and skeletal muscle density (SMD), key markers of nutritional status in cancer patients. Conventional manual methods are labour-intensive and require specialist expertise, limiting their routine clinical use. Therefore, this study serves as a feasibility and pilot investigation to explore the potential of deep learning-based automated regression for body composition analysis within a clinical workflow. Methods: Four deep learning architectures (AlexNet, UNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet34) were trained to predict SMA, SMD, subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and visceral fat area (VFA) from CT scans of colorectal cancer patients. Systematic hyperparameter optimization identified the most accurate models, which were subsequently implemented in a web application for clinical use. Results: GoogLeNet achieved the best performance, with a mean percentage error (PE) of 4.96% for SMA prediction, while AlexNet reached 8.12% for SMD. Independent testing demonstrated robust accuracy, correctly classifying body composition metrics in 80% of cases. The web application delivered rapid and consistent outputs, supporting integration into clinical workflows. Conclusion: Optimized deep learning models, particularly GoogLeNet and AlexNet, can automate CT-derived body composition analysis with a Mean Percentage Error (PE) of 4.96% for SMA and 8.12% for SMD. These tools have the potential to streamline clinical practice by reducing the time and expertise required for manual segmentation. Further validation in larger, more diverse datasets is warranted.

Abstract:Background: Accurate body composition analysis using Computed Tomography (CT) scans is essential for assessing skeletal muscle area (SMA) and skeletal muscle density (SMD), key markers of nutritional status in cancer patients. Conventional manual methods are labour-intensive and require specialist expertise, limiting their routine clinical use. Therefore, this study serves as a feasibility and pilot investigation to explore the potential of deep learning-based automated regression for body composition analysis within a clinical workflow. Methods: Four deep learning architectures (AlexNet, UNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet34) were trained to predict SMA, SMD, subcutaneous fat area (SFA), and visceral fat area (VFA) from CT scans of colorectal cancer patients. Systematic hyperparameter optimization identified the most accurate models, which were subsequently implemented in a web application for clinical use. Results: GoogLeNet achieved the best performance, with a mean percentage error (PE) of 4.96% for SMA prediction, while AlexNet reached 8.12% for SMD. Independent testing demonstrated robust accuracy, correctly classifying body composition metrics in 80% of cases. The web application delivered rapid and consistent outputs, supporting integration into clinical workflows. Conclusion: Optimized deep learning models, particularly GoogLeNet and AlexNet, can automate CT-derived body composition analysis with a Mean Percentage Error (PE) of 4.96% for SMA and 8.12% for SMD. These tools have the potential to streamline clinical practice by reducing the time and expertise required for manual segmentation. Further validation in larger, more diverse datasets is warranted.

Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.15712 [eess.IV]

(or arXiv:2608.15712v1 [eess.IV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15712 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 329 words

Related coverage