aiqbench analysis
This research challenges the standard left-to-right generation paradigm in autoregressive speech synthesis by demonstrating that adaptive decoding orders within masked diffusion frameworks yield superior quality compared to fixed strategies. The study further validates that high-fidelity audio output is achievable even with aggressive 1-bit quantization of acoustic representations, offering new pathways for efficient model deployment.
Decoding Order Matters in Autoregressive Speech Synthesis
arXiv:2601.08450v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autoregressive speech synthesis often adopts a left-to-right order, yet generation order is a modelling choice. We investigate decoding order through masked diffusion framework, which progressively unmasks positions and allows arbitrary decoding orders during training and inference. By interpolating between identity and random permutations, we show that randomness in decoding order affects speech quality. We further compare fixed strategies, such as \texttt{l2r} and \texttt{r2l} with adaptive ones, such as Top-$K$, finding that fixed-order decoding, including the dominating left-to-right approach, is suboptimal, while adaptive decoding yields better performance. Finally, since masked diffusion requires discrete inputs, we quantise acoustic representations and find that even 1-bit quantisation can support reasonably high-quality speech.
Abstract:Autoregressive speech synthesis often adopts a left-to-right order, yet generation order is a modelling choice. We investigate decoding order through masked diffusion framework, which progressively unmasks positions and allows arbitrary decoding orders during training and inference. By interpolating between identity and random permutations, we show that randomness in decoding order affects speech quality. We further compare fixed strategies, such as \texttt{l2r} and \texttt{r2l} with adaptive ones, such as Top-$K$, finding that fixed-order decoding, including the dominating left-to-right approach, is suboptimal, while adaptive decoding yields better performance. Finally, since masked diffusion requires discrete inputs, we quantise acoustic representations and find that even 1-bit quantisation can support reasonably high-quality speech.
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2601.08450 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2601.08450v2 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.08450 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 207 words
Related coverage
DELTA-TTS: Adapting Autoregressive Model into Diffusion Language Model for Text-to-Speech
arXiv · Aug 6, 2026

Best Open Speech Recognition (ASR) Models in 2026: WER, Languages, Latency, and License Compared
MarkTechPost · Jul 23, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026

Adaptive Parallel Reasoning: The Next Paradigm in Efficient Inference Scaling
BAIR Blog · May 8, 2026