Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a critical security vulnerability in modern quantum error correction where poisoned calibration priors can drastically increase logical error rates without altering the underlying syndrome data. The authors propose PriorGuard, a lightweight semantic defense that validates prior updates against private evidence to mitigate this specific attack vector. This work advances the integrity of fault-tolerant quantum computing by addressing a previously overlooked threat surface in decoder calibration mechanisms.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Decoder-Prior Poisoning in Quantum Error Correction: Attacks and PriorGuard Defense

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.27805v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum error correction (QEC) protects quantum computations by repeatedly measuring stabilizer syndromes and using a classical decoder to infer corrections. Modern surface-code decoders are increasingly calibration-aware: they use recent device behavior to set priors such as matching-graph edge probabilities, and these priors directly shape the selected correction. We identify the prior-update path as an overlooked integrity-critical attack surface: a poisoned prior can change decoding decisions even when the syndrome stream, logical labels, and decoder implementation are unchanged. This makes prior poisoning different from ordinary syndrome anomalies and difficult for raw syndrome-anomaly tests to detect. We introduce PriorGuard, a lightweight semantic guard that checks proposed prior changes on high-influence detector-graph entries against private syndrome-derived evidence, accepts updates only when their log-odds movement is evidence-supported, and otherwise falls back to the last evidence-supported prior. We evaluate on Stim-generated rotated surface-code memory circuits decoded with PyMatching. Prior influence is highly concentrated, with the top 10 percent of entries carrying over 60 percent of positive logical-error influence; poisoning only 6.4 percent of decoder-prior entries can raise logical error rate (LER) by 3.35x. PriorGuard recovers most attack-induced loss with a low false-positive rate and modest update-boundary overhead of about 1.7--1.8 ms and less than 0.31 MB auxiliary memory per update.

Abstract:Quantum error correction (QEC) protects quantum computations by repeatedly measuring stabilizer syndromes and using a classical decoder to infer corrections. Modern surface-code decoders are increasingly calibration-aware: they use recent device behavior to set priors such as matching-graph edge probabilities, and these priors directly shape the selected correction. We identify the prior-update path as an overlooked integrity-critical attack surface: a poisoned prior can change decoding decisions even when the syndrome stream, logical labels, and decoder implementation are unchanged. This makes prior poisoning different from ordinary syndrome anomalies and difficult for raw syndrome-anomaly tests to detect. We introduce PriorGuard, a lightweight semantic guard that checks proposed prior changes on high-influence detector-graph entries against private syndrome-derived evidence, accepts updates only when their log-odds movement is evidence-supported, and otherwise falls back to the last evidence-supported prior. We evaluate on Stim-generated rotated surface-code memory circuits decoded with PyMatching. Prior influence is highly concentrated, with the top 10 percent of entries carrying over 60 percent of positive logical-error influence; poisoning only 6.4 percent of decoder-prior entries can raise logical error rate (LER) by 3.35x. PriorGuard recovers most attack-induced loss with a low false-positive rate and modest update-boundary overhead of about 1.7--1.8 ms and less than 0.31 MB auxiliary memory per update.

Accepted at IEEE QCE 2026. 4 pages, 8 figures

arXiv:2609.27805 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.27805v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27805 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words

Related coverage