Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a rigorous benchmark of decoder performance across major quantum software stacks, revealing consistent error-correction behaviors for surface codes and digitized-GKP circuits. By verifying contract-preserving interoperability between PennyLane, Qiskit, Cirq, and LiDMaS+, the research establishes a reliable foundation for cross-platform logical parity checks without relying on raw threshold equivalences.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Decoder Comparability Across Quantum Software Stacks: Repeated-Round Surface and Digitized-GKP Syndrome Replay

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.19446v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a contract-preserving, family-aware comparison of decoder behavior across four syndrome-generation stacks (PennyLane, Qiskit, Cirq, and a LiDMaS+ reference) under a fixed replay interface. Request streams from repeated-round surface-code and digitized-GKP circuits are replayed through BP, MWPM, and UF with matched controls. The unified matrix spans 24 cells and achieves line-level integrity: $24\,000$ request lines, $24\,000$ response lines, response ratio $=1.0$ in every cell, zero parse failures, and zero decoder-name mismatches. Fifteen warning-no-syndrome events occur only in GKP-Cirq rows. Within-family ordering is stable in both families ($\mathrm{BP}<\mathrm{MWPM}<\mathrm{UF}$); source-averaged flip counts are 2.435, 4.768, and 5.870 for surface and 1.595, 2.908, and 3.681 for GKP. Relative to MWPM, BP reduces mean intervention volume by $48.9\%$ in surface and $45.1\%$ in GKP. Source-vs-reference effects are family dependent, with larger coherent shifts in GKP. Source-bootstrap ranks remain unchanged, and hidden-truth sidecars add an outer-code logical-parity error-rate check in which UF has the largest source-mean rate in both families. The comparison is stack-aware, contract-verified, and avoids raw cross-family threshold-equivalence claims.

Abstract:We present a contract-preserving, family-aware comparison of decoder behavior across four syndrome-generation stacks (PennyLane, Qiskit, Cirq, and a LiDMaS+ reference) under a fixed replay interface. Request streams from repeated-round surface-code and digitized-GKP circuits are replayed through BP, MWPM, and UF with matched controls. The unified matrix spans 24 cells and achieves line-level integrity: $24\,000$ request lines, $24\,000$ response lines, response ratio $=1.0$ in every cell, zero parse failures, and zero decoder-name mismatches. Fifteen warning-no-syndrome events occur only in GKP-Cirq rows. Within-family ordering is stable in both families ($\mathrm{BP}<\mathrm{MWPM}<\mathrm{UF}$); source-averaged flip counts are 2.435, 4.768, and 5.870 for surface and 1.595, 2.908, and 3.681 for GKP. Relative to MWPM, BP reduces mean intervention volume by $48.9\%$ in surface and $45.1\%$ in GKP. Source-vs-reference effects are family dependent, with larger coherent shifts in GKP. Source-bootstrap ranks remain unchanged, and hidden-truth sidecars add an outer-code logical-parity error-rate check in which UF has the largest source-mean rate in both families. The comparison is stack-aware, contract-verified, and avoids raw cross-family threshold-equivalence claims.

arXiv:2607.19446 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2607.19446v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.19446 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words

Related coverage