aiqbench analysis
This research introduces DECODEM, a new benchmark suite designed to evaluate large language models on extracting structured governance variables from unstructured legal texts like charters and bylaws. The study demonstrates that while frontier models achieve high accuracy on most provisions, performance varies significantly across specific clauses, suggesting that pipeline design can partially substitute for raw model capability in certain efficiency-oriented settings.
DECODEM: Data Extraction from Corporate Organizational Documents via Enhanced Methods
arXiv:2607.15879v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Much empirical legal research depends on translating unstructured text into structured variables. In corporate governance research as elsewhere, this translation has traditionally relied on human coding of documents such as charters and bylaws, a process that is costly, difficult to scale, and often opaque. This paper introduces DECODEM, a set of benchmark datasets for evaluating the automated extraction of corporate governance variables from organizational documents. The benchmarks pair randomly sampled corporate charters and bylaws with high-quality human annotations covering a range of governance provisions commonly studied in empirical work. Using these datasets, the paper evaluates several large-language-model extraction pipelines that vary in prompt design, task decomposition, and document handling. The underlying task consists of a set of document-level binary classification problems, one for each governance variable. The results show that automated extraction is feasible at a high level of accuracy for many provisions, with median performance near the upper bound across approaches. At the same time, performance varies systematically across variables, with a small number of provisions accounting for most of the remaining errors. More elaborate prompting strategies and cascading pipelines do not consistently improve performance for frontier models, but substantially narrow the gap between frontier and efficiency-oriented models in some settings, suggesting that pipeline design can partly substitute for model capability. By providing a standardized benchmark and a systematic evaluation of extraction methods, the paper demonstrates that current frontier models can extract legally meaningful information from complex corporate documents with high accuracy and suggests an important future role for automated feature extraction in constructing corporate governance datasets.
Abstract:Much empirical legal research depends on translating unstructured text into structured variables. In corporate governance research as elsewhere, this translation has traditionally relied on human coding of documents such as charters and bylaws, a process that is costly, difficult to scale, and often opaque. This paper introduces DECODEM, a set of benchmark datasets for evaluating the automated extraction of corporate governance variables from organizational documents. The benchmarks pair randomly sampled corporate charters and bylaws with high-quality human annotations covering a range of governance provisions commonly studied in empirical work. Using these datasets, the paper evaluates several large-language-model extraction pipelines that vary in prompt design, task decomposition, and document handling. The underlying task consists of a set of document-level binary classification problems, one for each governance variable. The results show that automated extraction is feasible at a high level of accuracy for many provisions, with median performance near the upper bound across approaches. At the same time, performance varies systematically across variables, with a small number of provisions accounting for most of the remaining errors. More elaborate prompting strategies and cascading pipelines do not consistently improve performance for frontier models, but substantially narrow the gap between frontier and efficiency-oriented models in some settings, suggesting that pipeline design can partly substitute for model capability. By providing a standardized benchmark and a systematic evaluation of extraction methods, the paper demonstrates that current frontier models can extract legally meaningful information from complex corporate documents with high accuracy and suggests an important future role for automated feature extraction in constructing corporate governance datasets.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
I.2.7; J.1; H.3.1
arXiv:2607.15879 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.15879v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15879 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 361 words
Related coverage
DECODEM: Data Extraction from Corporate Organizational Documents via Enhanced Methods
arXiv · Jul 20, 2026

Article: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Phishing: How Phishing Technique Is Evolving and Implemented
InfoQ · Jun 8, 2026

10 Best Dark Web Monitoring Tools in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Aug 18, 2026

DeepSeek used distillation to train its R1 and V3 models
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 9, 2026