Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper establishes a fundamental computational barrier in quantum metrology by proving that determining the attainability of the Quantum Fisher Information is NP-hard. The result confirms that general criteria for saturating precision limits are likely impossible to compute efficiently, reflecting an intrinsic complexity rather than a lack of mathematical tools. This finding directly addresses a key open problem highlighted in recent quantum information theory literature.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Deciding the Attainability of the Multiparameter Quantum Fisher Information is NP-Hard

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.35975v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The quantum Fisher information (QFI) sets a fundamental bound on the attainable precision when estimating multiple parameters simultaneously. Incompatibility among the individually optimal measurements can, in some cases, imply that the precision limit set by the QFI is not attainable. In certain special cases, including pure states and full-rank states, the exact conditions for when the precision limit set by the QFI can be saturated are known. However, general conditions for the attainability of the QFI with measurements on individual copies of the quantum state have long been sought. Indeed, this was recently stated as one of the five problems in quantum information theory highlighted by [P. Horodecki et al, PRX Quantum 3, 010101 (2022)]. In this work we prove that exact attainability with individual measurements is NP-hard to decide, even for a restricted set of real, constant-rank quantum models. The source problem for our proof is the NP-hard problem of deciding whether a given bipartite density matrix is separable or not. Our result shows that the longstanding difficulty in obtaining general conditions for QFI attainability reflects a fundamental computational obstruction, rather than merely a limitation of existing mathematical techniques: unless P=NP, no efficiently computable necessary-and-sufficient criterion can exist in general.

Abstract:The quantum Fisher information (QFI) sets a fundamental bound on the attainable precision when estimating multiple parameters simultaneously. Incompatibility among the individually optimal measurements can, in some cases, imply that the precision limit set by the QFI is not attainable. In certain special cases, including pure states and full-rank states, the exact conditions for when the precision limit set by the QFI can be saturated are known. However, general conditions for the attainability of the QFI with measurements on individual copies of the quantum state have long been sought. Indeed, this was recently stated as one of the five problems in quantum information theory highlighted by [P. Horodecki et al, PRX Quantum 3, 010101 (2022)]. In this work we prove that exact attainability with individual measurements is NP-hard to decide, even for a restricted set of real, constant-rank quantum models. The source problem for our proof is the NP-hard problem of deciding whether a given bipartite density matrix is separable or not. Our result shows that the longstanding difficulty in obtaining general conditions for QFI attainability reflects a fundamental computational obstruction, rather than merely a limitation of existing mathematical techniques: unless P=NP, no efficiently computable necessary-and-sufficient criterion can exist in general.

arXiv:2609.35975 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.35975v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35975 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words

Related coverage