aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that in Rydberg-atom quantum annealing, spontaneous decay is approximately eight times more detrimental than dephasing, challenging the industry standard of treating both noise sources as a single scalar. By decoupling these error channels and optimizing the drive ramp-down fraction, researchers can recover roughly one-third of performance loss without requiring hardware upgrades. This finding provides a critical protocol-level strategy for improving optimization heuristics on current noisy quantum devices.
Decay versus dephasing in Rydberg analog optimization: exchange rate, mechanism, and schedule design
arXiv:2608.29858v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Numerical studies of noisy Rydberg-atom optimization almost universally compress decoherence into a single scalar, silently pricing spontaneous decay ($\Gamma$) and dephasing ($\gamma$) alike. We treat the two as independent axes, mapping a quantum-annealing heuristic for unit-disk maximum independent set on 20 random $N=10$ graphs across the $(\Gamma,\gamma)$ plane, with the annealing time re-optimized at every point. The mean approximation ratio does collapse onto one scalar, but onto $u=\kappa\Gamma+\gamma$ with $\kappa=8.05\pm0.5$ (stat) $\pm1.1$ (syst); the isotropic $\Gamma+\gamma$ fails by a factor of 30 in residual. First-order perturbation theory reproduces $\kappa$ from noiseless propagation alone and gives the mechanism: the objective is diagonal in the basis of the dephasing operator, so dephasing cannot change the answer once the drive is off, and a single driven atom already has $\kappa\simeq8.5$. The exchange rate is thus a property of the protocol as much as of the platform: the ramp-down fraction moves it between 2.3 and 16.3. At a fixed schedule it is stable across system sizes, interaction strengths, and estimators. Because the whole cost model is noiseless, a schedule can be tuned to a device's channel mixture without any noisy simulation: jointly tuning the drive ramp-down and the sweep's detuning ramp recovers about a third of the Markovian damage at no hardware cost, and the ramp the noise-aware objective selects is not the one noiseless optimization would choose. Per unit rate decay is eightfold the dearer channel, but the measured $T_1$ enters weighted by its branching ratio to the ground state ($b\approx0.4$ for the calibrated device), which leaves the two Lindblad channels comparably costly at a present-day operating point. One-parameter noise models remain serviceable, provided the parameter is $u$.
Abstract:Numerical studies of noisy Rydberg-atom optimization almost universally compress decoherence into a single scalar, silently pricing spontaneous decay ($\Gamma$) and dephasing ($\gamma$) alike. We treat the two as independent axes, mapping a quantum-annealing heuristic for unit-disk maximum independent set on 20 random $N=10$ graphs across the $(\Gamma,\gamma)$ plane, with the annealing time re-optimized at every point. The mean approximation ratio does collapse onto one scalar, but onto $u=\kappa\Gamma+\gamma$ with $\kappa=8.05\pm0.5$ (stat) $\pm1.1$ (syst); the isotropic $\Gamma+\gamma$ fails by a factor of 30 in residual. First-order perturbation theory reproduces $\kappa$ from noiseless propagation alone and gives the mechanism: the objective is diagonal in the basis of the dephasing operator, so dephasing cannot change the answer once the drive is off, and a single driven atom already has $\kappa\simeq8.5$. The exchange rate is thus a property of the protocol as much as of the platform: the ramp-down fraction moves it between 2.3 and 16.3. At a fixed schedule it is stable across system sizes, interaction strengths, and estimators. Because the whole cost model is noiseless, a schedule can be tuned to a device's channel mixture without any noisy simulation: jointly tuning the drive ramp-down and the sweep's detuning ramp recovers about a third of the Markovian damage at no hardware cost, and the ramp the noise-aware objective selects is not the one noiseless optimization would choose. Per unit rate decay is eightfold the dearer channel, but the measured $T_1$ enters weighted by its branching ratio to the ground state ($b\approx0.4$ for the calibrated device), which leaves the two Lindblad channels comparably costly at a present-day operating point. One-parameter noise models remain serviceable, provided the parameter is $u$.
21 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables. Code and data: this https URL
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Atomic Physics (physics.atom-ph)
arXiv:2608.29858 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.29858v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29858 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 384 words
Related coverage

Top Neutral Atom Quantum Computing Companies and Rydberg Array Vendor Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 28, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026