aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a distinct acoustic signature in the late decay region of impulsive sounds, enabling reliable detection of AI-generated audio against real recordings. By leveraging group delay analysis as a physically interpretable forensic cue, the study offers a robust method to complement existing magnitude-based classifiers for detecting synthetic audio artifacts. While broader validation is still needed, these findings advance the technical frontier of audio forensics by providing a measurable metric to distinguish generative model outputs from natural sound.
Decay-Region Group Delay as a Forensic Cue for AI-Generated Impulsive Sounds
arXiv:2608.26346v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate whether AI-generated impulsive sounds can be distinguished from real ones through group delay analysis. Our central finding is that AI-generated impulsive sounds show near-identical onset-region group-delay distributions but exhibit measurably different group-delay behavior in the late decay region: decay-region KL divergence reaches $0.322$ compared to near-zero onset divergence ($0.022$). Cross-band GD variability achieves single-feature AUC~=~0.720, and a Random Forest (RF) over nine decay-region features reaches AUC~$=$~0.884 under sample-disjoint evaluation. A group delay map used as a standalone 2D input to CNN classifiers achieves 90--94\% accuracy, demonstrating that group delay carries substantial discriminative information. Under generator hold-out, CNN and transformer classifiers show highly variable AUC (0.457--0.918). The group delay RF achieves the highest average hold-out accuracy among the evaluated methods ($66.7\%$) and avoids extreme below-random collapse, although its average AUC (0.731) is lower than CNN avg (0.762) and AST (0.772). Parameter sensitivity analysis across 27 STFT configurations confirms that the RF AUC remains stable (0.700--0.847, std~=~0.035). These results suggest that decay-region group delay can serve as a physically interpretable forensic cue that complements magnitude-based classifiers, while broader validation remains necessary.
Abstract:We investigate whether AI-generated impulsive sounds can be distinguished from real ones through group delay analysis. Our central finding is that AI-generated impulsive sounds show near-identical onset-region group-delay distributions but exhibit measurably different group-delay behavior in the late decay region: decay-region KL divergence reaches $0.322$ compared to near-zero onset divergence ($0.022$). Cross-band GD variability achieves single-feature AUC~=~0.720, and a Random Forest (RF) over nine decay-region features reaches AUC~$=$~0.884 under sample-disjoint evaluation. A group delay map used as a standalone 2D input to CNN classifiers achieves 90--94\% accuracy, demonstrating that group delay carries substantial discriminative information. Under generator hold-out, CNN and transformer classifiers show highly variable AUC (0.457--0.918). The group delay RF achieves the highest average hold-out accuracy among the evaluated methods ($66.7\%$) and avoids extreme below-random collapse, although its average AUC (0.731) is lower than CNN avg (0.762) and AST (0.772). Parameter sensitivity analysis across 27 STFT configurations confirms that the RF AUC remains stable (0.700--0.847, std~=~0.035). These results suggest that decay-region group delay can serve as a physically interpretable forensic cue that complements magnitude-based classifiers, while broader validation remains necessary.
6 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables. Submitted to IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) 2026
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.26346 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2608.26346v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26346 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026
Iteratively Tuning hipBLASLt TensileLite Kernels: A Smaller Search, a Faster Kernel
AMD · Sep 9, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026