aiqbench analysis
This research exposes a critical vulnerability in hosted AI agents where functional capabilities can be reconstructed via black-box task interactions, even when direct disclosure defenses are active. The proposed "Daydreaming" attack demonstrates that hiding skill files is insufficient to prevent attackers from stealing executable helpers through adaptive crafting of ordinary tasks. For the industry, this underscores the urgent need for new security frameworks that protect model behavior and logic beyond simple output filtering.
Daydreaming: Stealing Hidden Agent Skills through Black-Box Task Interaction
arXiv:2608.26733v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent skills bundle instructions, reference data, and executable helpers that let a general agent perform specialized tasks. Hosted providers can keep these files secret while selling access to task results, making the skill itself a valuable target. Existing disclosure defenses can block requests that ask for the skill or reproduce its text, but they cannot block customers from submitting the ordinary tasks the service is built to complete. We present Daydreaming, an execution-only attack that steals a multi-file skill through black-box task interactions. The victim is never asked to reveal the skill or grade a reconstruction. Instead, Daydreaming adaptively creates crafted tasks whose results distinguish possible hidden behaviors. It tests individual behaviors, uses attacker-controlled shadow agents to choose a design, and completes each file using stored victim results and local execution checks. We formalize three nested threat levels of access as Differential, Trace, and Output, and focus on Output, where the attacker sees only the final response and returned files. Across 7 skills and 4 victim models, Daydreaming recovers 86.8% of the original skill's capability at Output, outperforming SigLeak by almost 4x. It produces installable skills using a median of 32 victim calls per skill even with disclosure defenses enabled. These results show that hiding skill files and filtering direct disclosure do not, by themselves, prevent functional reconstruction through normal use.
Abstract:Agent skills bundle instructions, reference data, and executable helpers that let a general agent perform specialized tasks. Hosted providers can keep these files secret while selling access to task results, making the skill itself a valuable target. Existing disclosure defenses can block requests that ask for the skill or reproduce its text, but they cannot block customers from submitting the ordinary tasks the service is built to complete. We present Daydreaming, an execution-only attack that steals a multi-file skill through black-box task interactions. The victim is never asked to reveal the skill or grade a reconstruction. Instead, Daydreaming adaptively creates crafted tasks whose results distinguish possible hidden behaviors. It tests individual behaviors, uses attacker-controlled shadow agents to choose a design, and completes each file using stored victim results and local execution checks. We formalize three nested threat levels of access as Differential, Trace, and Output, and focus on Output, where the attacker sees only the final response and returned files. Across 7 skills and 4 victim models, Daydreaming recovers 86.8% of the original skill's capability at Output, outperforming SigLeak by almost 4x. It produces installable skills using a median of 32 victim calls per skill even with disclosure defenses enabled. These results show that hiding skill files and filtering direct disclosure do not, by themselves, prevent functional reconstruction through normal use.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.26733 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2608.26733v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26733 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 322 words
Related coverage
AgentLeak: Cloning Stronger LLM Agent Capabilities onto Weaker Agents Beyond Skill Stealing
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
Behavioral Skill Reconstruction: Reconstructing Hidden Functionality from LLM Agent Skills
arXiv · Aug 6, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026