aiqbench analysis
DataWeave advances the practical integration of LLMs into professional data journalism by shifting from autonomous generation to a collaborative, steerable workflow for structured data analysis. The system addresses critical real-world limitations such as schema drift and semantic misinterpretation through interactive planning and human-in-the-loop correction mechanisms. This approach offers a robust framework for deploying trustworthy AI in high-stakes investigative environments where hypothesis evolution is constant.
DataWeave: Deploying Human-LLM Analytics for Exploratory Structured Data Analysis
arXiv:2610.02679v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data journalism, the practice of using data analysis to surface newsworthy stories, depends increasingly on the ability of reporters and investigative journalists to uncover trends, disparities, and accountability narratives. In practice, exploring large structured datasets remains slow and brittle: journalists must navigate hundreds of variables across many datasets over years, understand data coding conventions, and write non-trivial analysis code while hypotheses evolve. Although LLMs are often touted as "ask in English, get SQL/answers," real newsroom workflows expose recurring failures, e.g., schema mismatches and drift, misread domain semantics and units, and silent assumptions. We present DataWeave, a system that addresses these needs by combining conversational interaction, schema grounding, analytical planning, and executable query generation to support exploratory analysis over structured data. Rather than treating LLMs as autonomous answer engines, DataWeave frames them as interactive partners whose outputs can be inspected, corrected, and steered as hypotheses shift. We present a case study with professional journalists using our system to analyze the U.S. Department of Education's Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), a high-stakes public dataset with substantial domain semantics and frequent schema updates. We also report how deployment experience and iterative refinement shaped the current DataWeave architecture and its analytical workflow. Our findings distill design principles and deployment lessons for trustworthy human-LLM collaboration in structured data analysis.
Abstract:Data journalism, the practice of using data analysis to surface newsworthy stories, depends increasingly on the ability of reporters and investigative journalists to uncover trends, disparities, and accountability narratives. In practice, exploring large structured datasets remains slow and brittle: journalists must navigate hundreds of variables across many datasets over years, understand data coding conventions, and write non-trivial analysis code while hypotheses evolve. Although LLMs are often touted as "ask in English, get SQL/answers," real newsroom workflows expose recurring failures, e.g., schema mismatches and drift, misread domain semantics and units, and silent assumptions. We present DataWeave, a system that addresses these needs by combining conversational interaction, schema grounding, analytical planning, and executable query generation to support exploratory analysis over structured data. Rather than treating LLMs as autonomous answer engines, DataWeave frames them as interactive partners whose outputs can be inspected, corrected, and steered as hypotheses shift. We present a case study with professional journalists using our system to analyze the U.S. Department of Education's Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), a high-stakes public dataset with substantial domain semantics and frequent schema updates. We also report how deployment experience and iterative refinement shaped the current DataWeave architecture and its analytical workflow. Our findings distill design principles and deployment lessons for trustworthy human-LLM collaboration in structured data analysis.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2610.02679 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.02679v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02679 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
Do Assessment Instruments Measure the Same Thing for Humans and LLMs? A Latent Structure Analysis
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026

What the Agentic Era Means for Data Science
KDnuggets · Jun 4, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026