Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This survey consolidates scattered work on how LLM training data is selected, weighted, and scheduled, framing these choices as policies that allocate a fixed compute budget across candidate examples. Its main contribution is a shared vocabulary and taxonomy (decision granularity, model dependence, temporal adaptivity) for comparing methods across pretraining and post-training. Readers should note the authors' own caveat: evidence that these strategies transfer across model scales, or deliver clearly lower end-to-end cost, is still limited.
Sources coveringarXiv, SiliconANGLE
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Data Strategies for Large Language Models: A Unified Perspective on the Training Lifecycle

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.21681v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data strategy plays a central role in training large language models (LLMs). It governs the selection, weighting, and scheduling of training data, thereby determining the capabilities a model can acquire from a fixed data budget. We treat high-quality data as having high training-dependent utility, which depends on the target objective, the model, and its training state rather than on the text alone. Research in this area now spans pretraining and post-training, but related ideas use inconsistent terminology and evaluation protocols. This work reviews data strategies across the training lifecycle and formulates them as policies that allocate a training budget over candidate examples. We organise methods by their decision granularity, model dependence, and temporal adaptivity, then compare their computational requirements and empirical support. Fine-grained or state-dependent policies offer more control but incur additional scoring, search, or rollout costs. Evidence for transfer across model scales and comparable end-to-end cost remains limited. A continuously updated list of papers, along with their public implementations, is available at https://github.com/xuyj233/data_strategy_survey.

Abstract:Data strategy plays a central role in training large language models (LLMs). It governs the selection, weighting, and scheduling of training data, thereby determining the capabilities a model can acquire from a fixed data budget. We treat high-quality data as having high training-dependent utility, which depends on the target objective, the model, and its training state rather than on the text alone. Research in this area now spans pretraining and post-training, but related ideas use inconsistent terminology and evaluation protocols. This work reviews data strategies across the training lifecycle and formulates them as policies that allocate a training budget over candidate examples. We organise methods by their decision granularity, model dependence, and temporal adaptivity, then compare their computational requirements and empirical support. Fine-grained or state-dependent policies offer more control but incur additional scoring, search, or rollout costs. Evidence for transfer across model scales and comparable end-to-end cost remains limited. A continuously updated list of papers, along with their public implementations, is available at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.21681 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.21681v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21681 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage