aiqbench analysis
This survey critically examines data-centric vulnerabilities in Large Language Models, addressing risks like prompt injection and data poisoning that threaten system reliability. It reviews essential defense mechanisms such as adversarial training, RLHF, and RAG while outlining future research directions focused on data provenance and verifiable machine forgetting. For practitioners and researchers, this work provides a structured framework for securing LLMs against malicious inputs and ensuring responsible deployment in critical applications.
Data Security in Large Language Models: Risks, Defense, and Directions
arXiv:2508.02312v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs), now a foundation in advancing natural language processing, power applications such as text generation, machine translation, and conversational systems. Despite their transformative potential, these models inherently rely on massive amounts of training data, often collected from diverse and uncurated sources, which exposes them to serious data security risks. Harmful or malicious data can compromise model behavior, leading to toxic outputs or hallucinations, while also creating vulnerabilities to data-driven attacks such as prompt injection and data poisoning. As LLMs continue to be integrated into critical real-world systems, understanding and addressing these data-centric security risks is imperative to safeguard user trust and system reliability. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the main data security risks facing LLMs and reviews current defense strategies, including adversarial training, data cleaning, output guardrails, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), data augmentation, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)/agent defenses. Additionally, we categorize and analyze relevant datasets used for assessing robustness and security across different domains, providing guidance for future research. Finally, we highlight key research directions that focus on data provenance and traceability, verifiable machine forgetting, secure model updates, standardized evaluation framework, explainability-driven security analysis, and effective governance frameworks, aiming to promote the safe and responsible development of LLM technology. This work seeks to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, driving progress toward data security in LLMs.
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs), now a foundation in advancing natural language processing, power applications such as text generation, machine translation, and conversational systems. Despite their transformative potential, these models inherently rely on massive amounts of training data, often collected from diverse and uncurated sources, which exposes them to serious data security risks. Harmful or malicious data can compromise model behavior, leading to toxic outputs or hallucinations, while also creating vulnerabilities to data-driven attacks such as prompt injection and data poisoning. As LLMs continue to be integrated into critical real-world systems, understanding and addressing these data-centric security risks is imperative to safeguard user trust and system reliability. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the main data security risks facing LLMs and reviews current defense strategies, including adversarial training, data cleaning, output guardrails, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), data augmentation, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)/agent defenses. Additionally, we categorize and analyze relevant datasets used for assessing robustness and security across different domains, providing guidance for future research. Finally, we highlight key research directions that focus on data provenance and traceability, verifiable machine forgetting, secure model updates, standardized evaluation framework, explainability-driven security analysis, and effective governance frameworks, aiming to promote the safe and responsible development of LLM technology. This work seeks to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, driving progress toward data security in LLMs.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2508.02312 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2508.02312v2 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.02312 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 38, 768 (2026)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44443-026-01200-9 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 338 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026