Data Science Approaches to Evaluating Honours Candidates

Abstract:We present a modular data-science pipeline for estimating public sentiment towards individuals from fragmented, unstructured open-source intelligence (OSINT). The method chains web search, text extraction, relevance filtering, tokenisation, co-reference resolution, and sentiment analysis to convert heterogeneous web material into auditable person-level sentiment distributions. We compare AFINN and VADER with MINOS, a domain-informed sentiment algorithm designed to detect language associated with reputational risk, misconduct, and positive public contribution. Applied to public figures with known reputational outcomes, MINOS gives the clearest separation between positive, ambiguous, and negative cases. The results show that chained NLP and OSINT methods can support transparent, reproducible, human-in-the-loop sentiment assessment for high-stakes decision support. We demonstrate the approach on the UK Honours system, where individuals are required to display high standards of public conduct to maintain an Honour.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.26135 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.26135v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26135 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Artificial Intelligence XLII. SGAI-AI 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 16302, pp. 330-343 (2026)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-11442-6_23 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.