Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

DashAct introduces a novel benchmark for GUI agents that diagnoses failures in interactive dashboard analysis at a fine-grained level, moving beyond simple success/failure metrics to reveal specific bottlenecks in context maintenance and visual grounding. By analyzing 357 human-verified trajectories, the study demonstrates that current AI models struggle even when provided with progressive support, offering actionable insights for improving the robustness of automated analytical workflows. This work is central to advancing machine learning capabilities in complex, stateful user interface environments where understanding the reasoning process is as critical as the final output.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

DashAct: A Progressive Diagnostic Benchmark for GUI Agents in Interactive Dashboard Analysis

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.32385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interactive dashboards require users to reveal and connect evidence across stateful interactions. Although graphical user interface (GUI) agents could automate this process, existing dashboard benchmarks primarily report final answers or task success. They provide limited insight into whether failures arise from maintaining the analytical process, selecting actions, or grounding visual targets. We introduce DashAct, to our knowledge the first benchmark to diagnose these failures at a fine-grained level within the same dashboard task. DashAct contains 357 human-verified interaction trajectories with milestone dependencies and hierarchical target annotations. Its progressive diagnostic cascade evaluates end-to-end execution, restores verified context for next-action prediction, and provides target semantics and a local view for visual grounding. By progressively restoring the conditions for success, DashAct measures the minimum support an agent needs to recover rather than scoring isolated skills. Experiments show that current models struggle even as support is added. The cascade outcomes reveal bottlenecks hidden by end-to-end scores and provide actionable guidance for improving GUI agents.

Abstract:Interactive dashboards require users to reveal and connect evidence across stateful interactions. Although graphical user interface (GUI) agents could automate this process, existing dashboard benchmarks primarily report final answers or task success. They provide limited insight into whether failures arise from maintaining the analytical process, selecting actions, or grounding visual targets. We introduce DashAct, to our knowledge the first benchmark to diagnose these failures at a fine-grained level within the same dashboard task. DashAct contains 357 human-verified interaction trajectories with milestone dependencies and hierarchical target annotations. Its progressive diagnostic cascade evaluates end-to-end execution, restores verified context for next-action prediction, and provides target semantics and a local view for visual grounding. By progressively restoring the conditions for success, DashAct measures the minimum support an agent needs to recover rather than scoring isolated skills. Experiments show that current models struggle even as support is added. The cascade outcomes reveal bottlenecks hidden by end-to-end scores and provide actionable guidance for improving GUI agents.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.32385 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2609.32385v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32385 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 257 words

Related coverage