DAGForge: Auditable Causal DAG Authoring with Biomedical Literature

arXiv:2607.21859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constructing causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) is a core step in biomedical causal analysis, yet it remains a largely manual process. Analysts must connect study variables to prior literature, evaluate uncertain causal claims, and preserve sufficient provenance for expert review. We present DAGForge, a browser-based system for authoring causal DAGs as auditable, evidence-linked artifacts. Given free-text descriptions of study concepts, DAGForge creates a reproducible literature snapshot, uses an LLM-based reasoning module to generate structured pairwise causal judgments grounded in verbatim evidence excerpts, and assembles those judgments into a constraint-checked graph. Each proposed edge includes confidence estimates, provenance, and a reviewable rationale. The interface supports study specification, progress monitoring, evidence review, graph comparison, adjustment-set computation, and export. In evaluations against both compact benchmark DAGs and reference DAGs derived from published literature, DAGForge achieves high edge recall on the literature-based cohort while retaining verifiable evidence trails absent from LLM-only baselines. DAGForge thus reduces the burden of causal DAG curation while making the resulting assumptions auditable, supporting the design, analysis, and interpretation of biomedical studies.

Abstract:Constructing causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) is a core step in biomedical causal analysis, yet it remains a largely manual process. Analysts must connect study variables to prior literature, evaluate uncertain causal claims, and preserve sufficient provenance for expert review. We present DAGForge, a browser-based system for authoring causal DAGs as auditable, evidence-linked artifacts. Given free-text descriptions of study concepts, DAGForge creates a reproducible literature snapshot, uses an LLM-based reasoning module to generate structured pairwise causal judgments grounded in verbatim evidence excerpts, and assembles those judgments into a constraint-checked graph. Each proposed edge includes confidence estimates, provenance, and a reviewable rationale. The interface supports study specification, progress monitoring, evidence review, graph comparison, adjustment-set computation, and export. In evaluations against both compact benchmark DAGs and reference DAGs derived from published literature, DAGForge achieves high edge recall on the literature-based cohort while retaining verifiable evidence trails absent from LLM-only baselines. DAGForge thus reduces the burden of causal DAG curation while making the resulting assumptions auditable, supporting the design, analysis, and interpretation of biomedical studies.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2607.21859 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.21859v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21859 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

DAGForge: Auditable Causal DAG Authoring with Biomedical Literature

Related coverage