Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

CUSE introduces a novel framework for fine-grained unlearning in multimodal large language models by leveraging counterfactual inputs and on-policy self-distillation to precisely control token-level forgetting while preserving non-target content. This approach addresses critical limitations in existing methods that suffer from coarse control and misalignment between training objectives and current model behavior, offering a significant improvement in balancing data removal with knowledge retention.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CUSE: Fine-Grained Multimodal Unlearning with Counterfactual Guidance and On-Policy Self-Distillation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or unsafe information from their training data. Effective unlearning must remove target information while preserving non-target content, even within the same response. Existing methods typically apply uniform forgetting objectives to complete responses and rely on fixed, off-policy supervision, resulting in coarse token control and misalignment with the model's current behavior. We propose CUSE, a Counterfactual-guided Unlearning framework via on-policy Self-distillation for multimodal large language models. It first constructs counterfactual inputs by removing target-related evidence and uses the resulting changes in token probabilities to identify which tokens require stronger forgetting. It then distills token-level forgetting and retention targets on responses sampled from the current policy, with a frozen copy of the original model serving as the teacher model augmented with the corresponding forgetting- and retention-oriented privileged contexts. This design jointly determines what to forget and what to preserve. On MLLMU-Bench, CUSE reduces forget-set ROUGE-L by 33.6% while achieving 1.2% higher retain-set ROUGE-L than the strongest baseline.

Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or unsafe information from their training data. Effective unlearning must remove target information while preserving non-target content, even within the same response. Existing methods typically apply uniform forgetting objectives to complete responses and rely on fixed, off-policy supervision, resulting in coarse token control and misalignment with the model's current behavior. We propose CUSE, a Counterfactual-guided Unlearning framework via on-policy Self-distillation for multimodal large language models. It first constructs counterfactual inputs by removing target-related evidence and uses the resulting changes in token probabilities to identify which tokens require stronger forgetting. It then distills token-level forgetting and retention targets on responses sampled from the current policy, with a frozen copy of the original model serving as the teacher model augmented with the corresponding forgetting- and retention-oriented privileged contexts. This design jointly determines what to forget and what to preserve. On MLLMU-Bench, CUSE reduces forget-set ROUGE-L by 33.6% while achieving 1.2% higher retain-set ROUGE-L than the strongest baseline.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.14763 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.14763v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14763 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words

Related coverage