aiqbench analysis
This research advances decentralized optimization on Hadamard manifolds by eliminating the need for curvature-dependent parameters in regret analysis, a significant step toward robust algorithms for hyperbolic geometry applications. By achieving Euclidean-matching convergence rates ($O(\sqrt{T})$ and $O(\log T)$) independent of sectional curvature bounds, the proposed Distributed Riemannian Online Gradient Descent method offers more practical guarantees for distributed systems operating on non-Euclidean spaces. Experiments confirm that these theoretical improvements hold without performance degradation in hyperbolic embedding tasks.
Curvature-Independent Regret Bounds for Distributed Online Optimization on Hadamard Manifolds
arXiv:2609.13646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This work addresses decentralized online Riemannian optimization on Hadamard manifolds. Prior work under geodesic convexity (g-convexity) may require curvature information in the optimization analysis, typically through a finite lower bound on the sectional curvature. Curvature may also enter the step size or contraction factor of tangent-space Riemannian consensus schemes. In this work, we relax the curvature dependence for a narrower class of horospherical convex (h-convex) functions. We study Distributed Riemannian Online Gradient Descent (D-ROGD), which combines local Riemannian h-subgradient updates with an implicit Fr\'echet-mean consensus. For h-convex and strongly h-convex local objectives, we establish $O(\sqrt{T})$ and $O(\log T)$ static regret, respectively, matching the corresponding Euclidean rates with respect to $T$, with network dependence governed solely by the spectral gap. To our knowledge, these are the first curvature-independent regret guarantees for decentralized online optimization on Hadamard manifolds. Experiments on hyperbolic embeddings corroborate the predicted rates, with no observable degradation due to curvature.
Abstract:This work addresses decentralized online Riemannian optimization on Hadamard manifolds. Prior work under geodesic convexity (g-convexity) may require curvature information in the optimization analysis, typically through a finite lower bound on the sectional curvature. Curvature may also enter the step size or contraction factor of tangent-space Riemannian consensus schemes. In this work, we relax the curvature dependence for a narrower class of horospherical convex (h-convex) functions. We study Distributed Riemannian Online Gradient Descent (D-ROGD), which combines local Riemannian h-subgradient updates with an implicit Fréchet-mean consensus. For h-convex and strongly h-convex local objectives, we establish $O(\sqrt{T})$ and $O(\log T)$ static regret, respectively, matching the corresponding Euclidean rates with respect to $T$, with network dependence governed solely by the spectral gap. To our knowledge, these are the first curvature-independent regret guarantees for decentralized online optimization on Hadamard manifolds. Experiments on hyperbolic embeddings corroborate the predicted rates, with no observable degradation due to curvature.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.13646 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.13646v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13646 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words
Related coverage
Decentralized Online Riemannian Optimization Beyond Hadamard Manifolds
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · Aug 3, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
Minimax Alternating Regret for the Experts Problem and Online Convex Optimization
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026