aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates how Large Language Models can leverage curated repositories of same-family neural networks to significantly boost the performance of low-performing targets within strict computational budgets. The research highlights that successful transfer depends critically on source-target compatibility and specific LLM adaptation strategies rather than merely copying stored accuracy metrics. By extending NNGPT with a source-guided route, TuneNNGen achieves substantial accuracy gains across multiple benchmarks like CIFAR-10 and SVHN.
Curating Same-Family Neural Networks for LLM-Guided Model Improvement: A Controlled Case Study
arXiv:2607.05704v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural-network repositories contain executable models, recipes, input transformations, and measured accuracies. We study whether one same-family experiment can be curated as prompt guidance for LLM-based improvement of a low-performing target under equal generation and evaluation budgets. TuneNNGen extends NNGPT with a source-guided route and compares it with target-only generation on one CIFAR-10 target, two fixed source-selection rules, three code LLMs, and an additional SVHN target. Under the historical one-epoch search protocol, best-of-budget accuracy on the available evaluation split rises from 23.98% to 50.49% on CIFAR-10 and from 22.54% to 78.80% on SVHN. Selected five-epoch, three-seed means on train-derived validation splits retain gains of 40.94 points on CIFAR-10, 18.83 on Imagenette, and 7.27 on CIFAR-100. Direct-copy and negative-control analyses show that gains depend on source-target compatibility and LLM adaptation; stored source accuracy alone does not predict transferability.
Abstract:Neural-network repositories contain executable models, recipes, input transformations, and measured accuracies. We study whether one same-family experiment can be curated as prompt guidance for LLM-based improvement of a low-performing target under equal generation and evaluation budgets. TuneNNGen extends NNGPT with a source-guided route and compares it with target-only generation on one CIFAR-10 target, two fixed source-selection rules, three code LLMs, and an additional SVHN target. Under the historical one-epoch search protocol, best-of-budget accuracy on the available evaluation split rises from 23.98% to 50.49% on CIFAR-10 and from 22.54% to 78.80% on SVHN. Selected five-epoch, three-seed means on train-derived validation splits retain gains of 40.94 points on CIFAR-10, 18.83 on Imagenette, and 7.27 on CIFAR-100. Direct-copy and negative-control analyses show that gains depend on source-target compatibility and LLM adaptation; stored source accuracy alone does not predict transferability.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2607.05704 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.05704v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.05704 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words
Related coverage

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026