aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces CrystalJev, a framework that repositions atomistic foundation models from slow simulators to fast decision-makers by integrating probabilistic calibration with value-of-information theory. By triggering expensive relaxation steps only when necessary, the method achieves significant computational savings while maintaining rigorous error bounds in prospective testing. This approach fundamentally shifts materials discovery workflows toward efficient, AI-driven triage of hypothetical structures.
CrystalJev: thinking fast and slow with atomistic foundation models for materials discovery
arXiv:2610.06985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Atomistic foundation models triage millions of hypothetical materials but are used as slow simulators, their thresholded energies taken at face value. They are better read as fast decision-makers. CrystalJev queries a frozen interatomic potential once per unrelaxed structure and answers typed questions with calibrated probabilities, finite-sample guarantees and a rule for when to think slowly. Across 65 Matbench Discovery models, a 'stable' call is a probability in disguise, explained by a model's errors and the candidate population. Once trained, one forward pass decides nearly as well as a relaxation at a thirtieth of its cost, and a value-of-information theory sends slower computation only where decisions can change. The same layer answers electronic, mechanical and molecular questions. In a registered prospective test with 700 new density-functional calculations, single-pass forecasts calibrated only on existing data over-stated the stable fraction of unseen candidates (5.8%) by at most 2.1 percentage points.
Abstract:Atomistic foundation models triage millions of hypothetical materials but are used as slow simulators, their thresholded energies taken at face value. They are better read as fast decision-makers. CrystalJev queries a frozen interatomic potential once per unrelaxed structure and answers typed questions with calibrated probabilities, finite-sample guarantees and a rule for when to think slowly. Across 65 Matbench Discovery models, a 'stable' call is a probability in disguise, explained by a model's errors and the candidate population. Once trained, one forward pass decides nearly as well as a relaxation at a thirtieth of its cost, and a value-of-information theory sends slower computation only where decisions can change. The same layer answers electronic, mechanical and molecular questions. In a registered prospective test with 700 new density-functional calculations, single-pass forecasts calibrated only on existing data over-stated the stable fraction of unseen candidates (5.8%) by at most 2.1 percentage points.
Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
arXiv:2610.06985 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
(or arXiv:2610.06985v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06985 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
The Verge · Oct 5, 2026

Presentation: Building GenAI Platform at DoorDash
InfoQ · Oct 3, 2026

Presentation: Autonomous Data Products for the Autonomous Era: Rethinking Data Architecture for GenAI
InfoQ · Jul 24, 2026