Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper argues that affordance models trained on human-annotated data can't tell a robot which grasps are physically feasible for its own gripper and arm. Its proposed fix trains a network on 3D object point clouds, robot geometry descriptors, and simulated execution outcomes. For AI readers, the notable result is the claim that conditioning on the robot outperforms a robot-agnostic baseline, though the evidence so far is a single simulated household-object evaluation on one arm and two gripper setups.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Cross-Embodiment Affordance Transfer for Robotic Manipulation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.18194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic manipulation systems commonly learn object affordances from human-annotated datasets, which reflect interaction possibilities for a human hand rather than the physical constraints of a specific robot. For example, a surface region of an object identified as graspable by a human annotator may be geometrically unreachable or mechanically infeasible for a robot, yet this mismatch is rarely addressed explicitly. To tackle this challenge, we proposed a framework that translates human affordance annotations into robot-executable affordance predictions conditioned on the physical properties of the robot. The network predicts which surface regions of an object are physically executable by the robot, given a 3D point cloud of an object and a descriptor encoding the robot's geometry and constraints. The model was trained using human-annotated affordances together with robotic execution outcomes from multiple sampled approach trials in simulation, where execution outcomes determined which regions are executable for the robot. The evaluation was performed on a household objects dataset using two parallel-jaw gripper configurations on a UR5e robot arm. The framework outperformed a model that does not receive information about the robot. The experimental results demonstrated that affordance prediction must be conditioned on the robot and that human annotations alone are insufficient for learning robot-executable affordance representations.

Abstract:Robotic manipulation systems commonly learn object affordances from human-annotated datasets, which reflect interaction possibilities for a human hand rather than the physical constraints of a specific robot. For example, a surface region of an object identified as graspable by a human annotator may be geometrically unreachable or mechanically infeasible for a robot, yet this mismatch is rarely addressed explicitly. To tackle this challenge, we proposed a framework that translates human affordance annotations into robot-executable affordance predictions conditioned on the physical properties of the robot. The network predicts which surface regions of an object are physically executable by the robot, given a 3D point cloud of an object and a descriptor encoding the robot's geometry and constraints. The model was trained using human-annotated affordances together with robotic execution outcomes from multiple sampled approach trials in simulation, where execution outcomes determined which regions are executable for the robot. The evaluation was performed on a household objects dataset using two parallel-jaw gripper configurations on a UR5e robot arm. The framework outperformed a model that does not receive information about the robot. The experimental results demonstrated that affordance prediction must be conditioned on the robot and that human annotations alone are insufficient for learning robot-executable affordance representations.

This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2610.18194 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.18194v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18194 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words

Related coverage