Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

CropCop demonstrates a rigorous pipeline for validating computer vision models by auditing training data leakage and ensuring runtime fidelity through post-training quantization. The study highlights critical engineering trade-offs, showing that while INT8 conversion preserves high accuracy on specific benchmarks, subtle recall drops can occur in long-tailed distributions like fruit classification. This work provides essential methodological insights for deploying reliable AI systems in agricultural settings where data integrity and model robustness are paramount.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CropCop: An Auditable 120-Class Plant-Health Model from Benchmark Reconstruction to a Quantised Runtime Artifact

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.25539v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A plant-health score can appear precise while resting on duplicated image families, a long-tailed label space, or a runtime file that was never evaluated. We present CropCop, a closed-set recognition system spanning 120 operational plant-health classes and an evidence chain from corpus reconstruction to direct execution of the final quantised artifact. Starting from 117,546 audited images, we rejected the inherited partition after confirming 3,233 duplicate relationships across split boundaries and froze a 109,107-image benchmark with zero crossings among the audited trusted leakage groups and a 151.7 largest-to-smallest class ratio. A fully fine-tuned DINOv3 ConvNeXt-Tiny reference achieved 98.51% accuracy and 96.87% macro-F1 on the locked internal test. A compact MobileNetV4 Conv-Medium derivative achieved 98.46% accuracy and 96.27% macro-F1 without being presented as evidence for a new distillation method. Validation-only post-training quantisation selected dynamic activations with per-channel weights, and the final 22.60 MiB ExecuTorch/XNNPACK PTE achieved 98.46% accuracy and 96.23% macro-F1 when executed directly. Only six of 16,363 top-1 decisions changed between the converted INT8 graph and the PTE, while paired analysis showed a modest class-balanced loss; an exploratory post hoc fruit-label slice localized a larger recall decline than aggregate accuracy revealed. CropCop establishes strong leakage-controlled internal recognition and software-runtime fidelity; it does not establish performance on unseen farms, camera pipelines, or physical Android hardware.

Abstract:A plant-health score can appear precise while resting on duplicated image families, a long-tailed label space, or a runtime file that was never evaluated. We present CropCop, a closed-set recognition system spanning 120 operational plant-health classes and an evidence chain from corpus reconstruction to direct execution of the final quantised artifact. Starting from 117,546 audited images, we rejected the inherited partition after confirming 3,233 duplicate relationships across split boundaries and froze a 109,107-image benchmark with zero crossings among the audited trusted leakage groups and a 151.7 largest-to-smallest class ratio. A fully fine-tuned DINOv3 ConvNeXt-Tiny reference achieved 98.51% accuracy and 96.87% macro-F1 on the locked internal test. A compact MobileNetV4 Conv-Medium derivative achieved 98.46% accuracy and 96.27% macro-F1 without being presented as evidence for a new distillation method. Validation-only post-training quantisation selected dynamic activations with per-channel weights, and the final 22.60 MiB ExecuTorch/XNNPACK PTE achieved 98.46% accuracy and 96.23% macro-F1 when executed directly. Only six of 16,363 top-1 decisions changed between the converted INT8 graph and the PTE, while paired analysis showed a modest class-balanced loss; an exploratory post hoc fruit-label slice localized a larger recall decline than aggregate accuracy revealed. CropCop establishes strong leakage-controlled internal recognition and software-runtime fidelity; it does not establish performance on unseen farms, camera pipelines, or physical Android hardware.

25 pages, 6 figures, and 15 tables. Includes benchmark-audit, model-retention, runtime-fidelity, and reproducibility appendices

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

I.2.6; I.4.8; I.4.9

arXiv:2608.25539 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2608.25539v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25539 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 330 words

Related coverage