Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study applies Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) corrections to the Lamb shift of accelerated atoms interacting with a scalar field, isolating vacuum fluctuation effects from radiation reaction. The analysis reveals that GUP-induced shifts are purely nonthermal at high accelerations and exhibit distinct nonlinear dependencies on acceleration profiles for uniform versus circular motion. These findings refine theoretical models of quantum field interactions under extreme kinematic conditions without implying immediate practical applications for current AI or quantum hardware.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space, LessWrong, AMD
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Corrections induced by the GUP to the Lamb shift of an accelerated atom interacting with a quantum scalar field

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.26914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate the effect of the GUP on the Lamb shift of a two-level atom interacting with a real massless scalar quantum field, within the DDC formalism. For an atom undergoing inertial motion, uniform acceleration, and uniform circular motion, we analyze the separate contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction. We first derive the statistical functions of the field along the atom's trajectories for the three types of motion, expressing them as frequency integrals, and then employ them to calculate the vacuum fluctuation and radiation reaction contributions to the radiative level shift. We show that the GUP-modified Lamb shift of the two-level atom arises entirely from vacuum fluctuations and acquires additional corrections proportional to $\beta$. We focus in particular on the acceleration-dependent GUP corrections. For a uniformly accelerated atom, the GUP corrections comprise thermal and nonthermal parts. At low accelerations, the thermal part exhibits nonmonotonic behavior, and is proportional to $a^4$ in the limit $a/\omega_0 \to 0$; the nonthermal part, by contrast, grows nonlinearly and monotonically, exceeding the thermal part by nearly two orders of magnitude at large accelerations. For an atom in uniform circular motion, the GUP corrections are purely nonthermal and also display a nonlinear, monotonic dependence on acceleration, increasing or decreasing steeply according to the sign of $\beta$. For the same $\beta$, the corrections are larger in uniform circular motion than in uniformly accelerated motion, since the former involves terms proportional to both $a^2$ and $a^3$, whereas the latter contains only $a^2$ terms.

Abstract:We investigate the effect of the GUP on the Lamb shift of a two-level atom interacting with a real massless scalar quantum field, within the DDC formalism. For an atom undergoing inertial motion, uniform acceleration, and uniform circular motion, we analyze the separate contributions of vacuum fluctuations and radiation reaction. We first derive the statistical functions of the field along the atom's trajectories for the three types of motion, expressing them as frequency integrals, and then employ them to calculate the vacuum fluctuation and radiation reaction contributions to the radiative level shift. We show that the GUP-modified Lamb shift of the two-level atom arises entirely from vacuum fluctuations and acquires additional corrections proportional to $\beta$. We focus in particular on the acceleration-dependent GUP corrections. For a uniformly accelerated atom, the GUP corrections comprise thermal and nonthermal parts. At low accelerations, the thermal part exhibits nonmonotonic behavior, and is proportional to $a^4$ in the limit $a/\omega_0 \to 0$; the nonthermal part, by contrast, grows nonlinearly and monotonically, exceeding the thermal part by nearly two orders of magnitude at large accelerations. For an atom in uniform circular motion, the GUP corrections are purely nonthermal and also display a nonlinear, monotonic dependence on acceleration, increasing or decreasing steeply according to the sign of $\beta$. For the same $\beta$, the corrections are larger in uniform circular motion than in uniformly accelerated motion, since the former involves terms proportional to both $a^2$ and $a^3$, whereas the latter contains only $a^2$ terms.

arXiv:2608.26914 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.26914v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26914 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words

Related coverage