aiqbench analysis
This research introduces CordisBench, a rigorous benchmark evaluating whether language models can reason about component lifecycles within dynamic agent harnesses where code changes propagate through dependencies. The study reveals that while models handle small systems effectively, reliability degrades significantly as interaction complexity increases, highlighting a critical gap in automated reasoning for software maintenance tasks. For AI developers building autonomous agents, this work underscores the substantial inference costs required to achieve reliable lifecycle management and suggests that formal semantics may offer more efficient alternatives than raw model scaling.
CordisBench: Can Language Models Reason About Component Lifecycles in Dynamic Agent Harnesses?
arXiv:2609.01600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dynamic agent harnesses let language models change the software that shapes their own execution. This flexibility brings a new reasoning burden: a local plugin change can propagate through dependencies and cleanup. We introduce CordisBench, a 1,200-question benchmark of this lifecycle reasoning. It combines a controlled formal setting with programs executed against Cordis, a runtime that manages component dependencies and cleanup, and asks models to identify affected components, predict state after a specified teardown order, determine which conditions hold under all or some orders, and choose reconfigurations that succeed when executed. Across these tasks, we evaluate three efficiency-oriented models at low reasoning effort with 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, or 32 relevant interactions, using deterministic task-specific scoring. Models usually handle small systems well but grow less reliable as more interactions become relevant, especially when predicting final state and when reasoning across teardown orders. Additional inference effort recovers marked gains for some models. The cost is nontrivial: on our 16-interaction subset, GPT-5.6 Luna uses nearly 3,000 reasoning tokens per question at medium effort. For these controlled instances, that cost is avoidable: an independent finite reference semantics agrees with Cordis execution on every observation and action outcome used for scoring across all 528 executable questions.
Title:CordisBench: Can Language Models Reason About Component Lifecycles in Dynamic Agent Harnesses?
Abstract:Dynamic agent harnesses let language models change the software that shapes their own execution. This flexibility brings a new reasoning burden: a local plugin change can propagate through dependencies and cleanup. We introduce CordisBench, a 1,200-question benchmark of this lifecycle reasoning. It combines a controlled formal setting with programs executed against Cordis, a runtime that manages component dependencies and cleanup, and asks models to identify affected components, predict state after a specified teardown order, determine which conditions hold under all or some orders, and choose reconfigurations that succeed when executed. Across these tasks, we evaluate three efficiency-oriented models at low reasoning effort with 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, or 32 relevant interactions, using deterministic task-specific scoring. Models usually handle small systems well but grow less reliable as more interactions become relevant, especially when predicting final state and when reasoning across teardown orders. Additional inference effort recovers marked gains for some models. The cost is nontrivial: on our 16-interaction subset, GPT-5.6 Luna uses nearly 3,000 reasoning tokens per question at medium effort. For these controlled instances, that cost is avoidable: an independent finite reference semantics agrees with Cordis execution on every observation and action outcome used for scoring across all 528 executable questions.
13 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables. Code: this https URL ; Data: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.01600 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.01600v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01600 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 327 words
Related coverage

A shared agentic platform for Wood Mackenzie, on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Sep 17, 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026

How HPE Zerto built an agentic troubleshooting system with Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Sep 8, 2026

Rethinking Robot Safety in the Age of AI
IEEE Spectrum · Sep 16, 2026