Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces CORA, a diagnostic protocol that evaluates Text-to-Audio retrieval robustness by testing how performance degrades when user queries are reformulated while keeping the target audio fixed. The study reveals that retrieval failures are driven primarily by boundary margin degradation rather than simple semantic shifts in the query text, offering a new metric (RankDrop) to identify hidden weaknesses in current models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CORA: A Protocol for Diagnosing Boundary Robustness in Text-to-Audio Retrieval under Query Reformulations

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.33433v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-Audio (T2A) retrievers are typically evaluated with caption style queries, but the same user intent can be expressed in many forms. We introduce CORA (Caption-Offset Retrieval for Audio), a caption anchored diagnostic protocol that rewrites each source caption into five intent preserving forms (Command, Question, Indirect, Key phrase, and Statement) while fixing the target audio. By tracking the same target across query forms, CORA defines RankDrop, a metric revealing failures hidden by Recall@k. Using Pearson's correlation coefficient r, we find that RankDrop is weakly associated with raw text space movement (r=0.084), but strongly associated with Target Alignment Loss and Target Boundary Margin Degradation (r=0.508 and r=0.615). The same pattern appears in OEA retrievers, where RankDrop is better explained by boundary degradation (r=0.472/0.478) than by query movement (r=0.084/0.046). Overall, these results suggest that robust T2A retrieval requires preserving the target's boundary advantage over competing audio under reformulation.

Abstract:Text-to-Audio (T2A) retrievers are typically evaluated with caption style queries, but the same user intent can be expressed in many forms. We introduce CORA (Caption-Offset Retrieval for Audio), a caption anchored diagnostic protocol that rewrites each source caption into five intent preserving forms (Command, Question, Indirect, Key phrase, and Statement) while fixing the target audio. By tracking the same target across query forms, CORA defines RankDrop, a metric revealing failures hidden by Recall@k. Using Pearson's correlation coefficient r, we find that RankDrop is weakly associated with raw text space movement (r=0.084), but strongly associated with Target Alignment Loss and Target Boundary Margin Degradation (r=0.508 and r=0.615). The same pattern appears in OEA retrievers, where RankDrop is better explained by boundary degradation (r=0.472/0.478) than by query movement (r=0.084/0.046). Overall, these results suggest that robust T2A retrieval requires preserving the target's boundary advantage over competing audio under reformulation.

Accepted to Findings of IJCNLP-AACL. Code and data: this https URL

Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)

arXiv:2609.33433 [cs.SD]

(or arXiv:2609.33433v1 [cs.SD] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33433 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 259 words

Related coverage