Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes optimal trade-offs between quantum state copies and Hamiltonian evolution time for probing ground states in copy-scarce regimes. By introducing parallel catalytic readouts, the protocol minimizes resource consumption while maintaining fidelity, offering a significant efficiency gain over conventional copy-consuming methods. These findings advance the practical feasibility of characterizing complex quantum matter with limited hardware resources.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Copy-scarce learning of ground states

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.38513v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Probing multiple properties of ground states is central to understanding quantum matter, yet conventional readout can be prohibitively costly because it consumes many independently prepared copies. Here, in copy-scarce regimes, we establish optimal trade-offs between the number of initial ground-state copies and elapsed Hamiltonian-evolution time required for estimating multiple observables or reconstructing a full classical description of a unique gapped ground state. We derive a unifying inequality that quantifies how well ground states can be distinguished using initial copies and controlled dynamics, even when all copies may be consumed. It yields worst-case lower bounds on elapsed Hamiltonian time that any protocol must incur to perform either task. We construct parallel catalytic readouts that return all initial copies nearly unchanged while attaining these bounds up to poly-logarithmic factors. Our protocols require no coherent preparation circuit or its inverse, and their elapsed Hamiltonian time depends only logarithmically on the inverse of the desired return error. Thus, optimal copy--dynamics trade-offs can be attained together with catalytic return. Numerical benchmarks further show substantial reductions in end-to-end elapsed Hamiltonian time relative to a task-specialized copy-consuming protocol, even under an optimistic preparation-cost model. Our results reveal a copy--dynamics resource landscape connecting copy-scarce learning to copy-only endpoints realized by known protocols for shadow tomography and pure-state tomography.

Abstract:Probing multiple properties of ground states is central to understanding quantum matter, yet conventional readout can be prohibitively costly because it consumes many independently prepared copies. Here, in copy-scarce regimes, we establish optimal trade-offs between the number of initial ground-state copies and elapsed Hamiltonian-evolution time required for estimating multiple observables or reconstructing a full classical description of a unique gapped ground state. We derive a unifying inequality that quantifies how well ground states can be distinguished using initial copies and controlled dynamics, even when all copies may be consumed. It yields worst-case lower bounds on elapsed Hamiltonian time that any protocol must incur to perform either task. We construct parallel catalytic readouts that return all initial copies nearly unchanged while attaining these bounds up to poly-logarithmic factors. Our protocols require no coherent preparation circuit or its inverse, and their elapsed Hamiltonian time depends only logarithmically on the inverse of the desired return error. Thus, optimal copy--dynamics trade-offs can be attained together with catalytic return. Numerical benchmarks further show substantial reductions in end-to-end elapsed Hamiltonian time relative to a task-specialized copy-consuming protocol, even under an optimistic preparation-cost model. Our results reveal a copy--dynamics resource landscape connecting copy-scarce learning to copy-only endpoints realized by known protocols for shadow tomography and pure-state tomography.

arXiv:2609.38513 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.38513v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38513 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 301 words

Related coverage