aiqbench analysis
COPE introduces a novel framework for continually optimizing Large Language Models using sparse user feedback by leveraging personalized embeddings and self-evaluation mechanisms. This approach effectively addresses the limitations of static training methods and context-heavy prompt engineering, enabling real-world adaptation without explicit rewards. The method demonstrates robust performance in maintaining general capabilities while accommodating shifting user preferences.
COPE: Continual Personalization of LLMs under Sparse User Feedback via User Embeddings and Self-Evaluation
arXiv:2609.26853v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable results across various benchmarks, their alignment with normative values often results in homogenized responses that fail to address diverse user preferences. Existing training-free methods often occupy valuable context windows through prompt engineering, while training-based methods typically remain static post-training, failing to support the continual optimization required in real-world settings. To address these challenges, we propose COPE (Continual Optimization with Personalized embedding and self-Evaluation), a novel optimization framework tailored for real-world-motivated interaction settings with sparse user feedback. Our framework assigns learnable personalized embeddings to each user and synergistically integrates preference capture, self-evaluation calibration, and personalized response optimization within a single update step. A key innovation of our method is the use of self-evaluation to generate proxy rewards, enabling continuous model updates even when explicit user feedback is unavailable. Experiments show that COPE consistently outperforms strong training-free and training-based baselines under sparse feedback, and remains complementary to Retrieval-Augmented Prompting (RAP). Further analyses confirm COPE's reliable self-evaluation, meaningful preference patterns, stable general capabilities, and robustness under shifting preferences and alternative evaluators.
Abstract:While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable results across various benchmarks, their alignment with normative values often results in homogenized responses that fail to address diverse user preferences. Existing training-free methods often occupy valuable context windows through prompt engineering, while training-based methods typically remain static post-training, failing to support the continual optimization required in real-world settings. To address these challenges, we propose COPE (Continual Optimization with Personalized embedding and self-Evaluation), a novel optimization framework tailored for real-world-motivated interaction settings with sparse user feedback. Our framework assigns learnable personalized embeddings to each user and synergistically integrates preference capture, self-evaluation calibration, and personalized response optimization within a single update step. A key innovation of our method is the use of self-evaluation to generate proxy rewards, enabling continuous model updates even when explicit user feedback is unavailable. Experiments show that COPE consistently outperforms strong training-free and training-based baselines under sparse feedback, and remains complementary to Retrieval-Augmented Prompting (RAP). Further analyses confirm COPE's reliable self-evaluation, meaningful preference patterns, stable general capabilities, and robustness under shifting preferences and alternative evaluators.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.26853 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.26853v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26853 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words
Related coverage
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Exploring Hierarchical Interest Representation For Meta Ads Deep Funnel Optimization
Meta Engineering · Jul 15, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026