aiqbench analysis
This research advances stochastic control theory by integrating learning-based models into chance-constrained frameworks, specifically addressing uncertainty in hybrid powertrain specifications. By jointly optimizing control inputs and risk allocation under non-Gaussian conditions, the study provides a mathematically rigorous approach to improving charge sustainability while minimizing constraint violations. The work bridges theoretical optimization with practical machine learning applications in energy systems, offering significant value for readers focused on advanced ML integration in physical control loops.
Convex Chance-Constrained Stochastic Control under Uncertain Specifications with Application to Learning-Based Hybrid Powertrain Control
arXiv:2601.18313v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper proposes a strictly convex chance-constrained stochastic control framework that accounts for uncertainty in control specifications such as reference trajectories and operational constraints. Control inputs and risk allocation are jointly optimized under general, possibly non-Gaussian, uncertainties through sufficient deterministic conditions for probabilistic constraint satisfaction. A decreasing risk regularizer ensures existence and full use of the allowable risk. Under the stated regularity assumptions, the joint solution is unique and locally Lipschitz-continuous, supporting stable numerical optimization. The formulation is extended to learning-based exactly linearizable (EL) models through monotone state and input transformations. A hybrid powertrain example compares deterministic control, equal risk allocation, and optimized risk allocation with and without regularization in terms of charge sustaining, constraint violations, closed-loop cost, and solver time.
Abstract:This paper proposes a strictly convex chance-constrained stochastic control framework that accounts for uncertainty in control specifications such as reference trajectories and operational constraints. Control inputs and risk allocation are jointly optimized under general, possibly non-Gaussian, uncertainties through sufficient deterministic conditions for probabilistic constraint satisfaction. A decreasing risk regularizer ensures existence and full use of the allowable risk. Under the stated regularity assumptions, the joint solution is unique and locally Lipschitz-continuous, supporting stable numerical optimization. The formulation is extended to learning-based exactly linearizable (EL) models through monotone state and input transformations. A hybrid powertrain example compares deterministic control, equal risk allocation, and optimized risk allocation with and without regularization in terms of charge sustaining, constraint violations, closed-loop cost, and solver time.
Systems and Control (eess.SY); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2601.18313 [eess.SY]
(or arXiv:2601.18313v2 [eess.SY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18313 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage
Optimization for One, Feasibility for Most: Decoupling Optimization from Feasibility in Chance-Constrained Programs
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
Learn Feasibility Once, Optimize All Objectives: Derivative-Free Diffusion Models for Chance-Constrained Programming
arXiv · Oct 5, 2026
Debating RSI, the US-China Gap, and Jaggedness with JS Denain of Epoch AI
Interconnects · Sep 22, 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026