aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a theoretical convergence analysis of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) variants when combined with increasing batch sizes or decaying learning rates, demonstrating improved generalization through flatter minima. The study offers practical insights for optimizing deep neural network training dynamics by validating that adaptive sharpness decreases under these specific hyperparameter schedules.
Convergence of Sharpness-Aware Minimization Algorithms using Increasing Batch Size and Decaying Learning Rate
arXiv:2409.09984v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) algorithm and its variants, including gap guided SAM (GSAM), have been successful at improving the generalization capability of deep neural network models by finding flat local minima of the empirical loss in training. Meanwhile, it has been shown theoretically and practically that increasing the batch size or decaying the learning rate avoids sharp local minima of the empirical loss. In this paper, we consider the GSAM algorithm with increasing batch sizes or decaying learning rates, such as cosine annealing or linear learning rate, and theoretically show its convergence. Moreover, we numerically compare SAM (GSAM) with and without an increasing batch size and conclude that using an increasing batch size { achieves a lower worst-case $\ell_\infty$ adaptive sharpness} than compared with using a constant batch size and learning rate.
Abstract:The sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) algorithm and its variants, including gap guided SAM (GSAM), have been successful at improving the generalization capability of deep neural network models by finding flat local minima of the empirical loss in training. Meanwhile, it has been shown theoretically and practically that increasing the batch size or decaying the learning rate avoids sharp local minima of the empirical loss. In this paper, we consider the GSAM algorithm with increasing batch sizes or decaying learning rates, such as cosine annealing or linear learning rate, and theoretically show its convergence. Moreover, we numerically compare SAM (GSAM) with and without an increasing batch size and conclude that using an increasing batch size { achieves a lower worst-case $\ell_\infty$ adaptive sharpness} than compared with using a constant batch size and learning rate.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2409.09984 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2409.09984v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.09984 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 228 words
Related coverage

[AINews] DeepSeek v4.1-Flash: 763B-P8B-D16B novel causal Encoder–Decoder architecture with vision marks the Return of the Whale
Latent Space · Sep 12, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026

Building Blocks for Foundation Model Training and Inference on AWS
Hugging Face · May 11, 2026
From Perturbation Correction to Geometry-Aware Sampling: Sharpness-Guided Equilibrium Sampling for Balanced Flat Minima in Long-Tailed Learning
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026