aiqbench analysis
This paper provides theoretical convergence proofs for the Muon optimizer, establishing that weight decay ensures parameter boundedness without relying on restrictive gradient assumptions. By deriving a lower bound on the critical batch size, the authors clarify how momentum and weight decay hyperparameters qualitatively influence training complexity across image and language modeling tasks. These findings offer a rigorous foundation for adopting Muon as a practical successor to standard optimizers like AdamW.
Convergence Bound and Critical Batch Size of Muon Optimizer
arXiv:2507.01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW. This paper presents theoretical analysis to support its practical success. We provide convergence proofs for Muon across four practical settings, systematically examining its behavior with and without the inclusion of Nesterov momentum and weight decay. We then demonstrate that the addition of weight decay ensures almost-sure boundedness of the parameter and gradient norms -- without relying on the commonly imposed bounded-gradient assumption -- and clarify the interplay between the weight decay coefficient and the learning rate. Finally, we derive a lower bound on the critical batch size for Muon -- the batch size that minimizes the stochastic first-order oracle (SFO) complexity of training. Because the resulting formula involves problem-dependent quantities that are not directly observable (gradient variance, target precision, effective rank), it does not predict the critical batch size in absolute terms; rather, it reveals how the hyperparameters $\beta$ (momentum) and $\lambda$ (weight decay) govern the qualitative scaling of this value. Our experiments validate these hyperparameter-dependent predictions across workloads including image classification and language modeling.
Abstract:Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW. This paper presents theoretical analysis to support its practical success. We provide convergence proofs for Muon across four practical settings, systematically examining its behavior with and without the inclusion of Nesterov momentum and weight decay. We then demonstrate that the addition of weight decay ensures almost-sure boundedness of the parameter and gradient norms -- without relying on the commonly imposed bounded-gradient assumption -- and clarify the interplay between the weight decay coefficient and the learning rate. Finally, we derive a lower bound on the critical batch size for Muon -- the batch size that minimizes the stochastic first-order oracle (SFO) complexity of training. Because the resulting formula involves problem-dependent quantities that are not directly observable (gradient variance, target precision, effective rank), it does not predict the critical batch size in absolute terms; rather, it reveals how the hyperparameters $\beta$ (momentum) and $\lambda$ (weight decay) govern the qualitative scaling of this value. Our experiments validate these hyperparameter-dependent predictions across workloads including image classification and language modeling.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2507.01598 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2507.01598v5 [cs.LG] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 208 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026
Enabling DeepSeek-V4-Flash Training on AMD Instinct MI355X GPUs with Primus
AMD · Sep 3, 2026

Large to Small Model Stitching Destroys What You Built It to Carry Along the Fit
LessWrong · Oct 11, 2026