aiqbench analysis
This research presents a novel attack vector against black-box large language models by reconstructing token probabilities directly from sampled text outputs, bypassing the need for model weights or numerical access. By focusing control efforts on specific positions where distributional shifts occur and utilizing speculative execution to reduce query costs, the study demonstrates a significant threat to current safety alignment mechanisms in text-only interfaces. The findings highlight critical vulnerabilities in generative AI systems that rely solely on sampled responses, necessitating more robust defenses against probability manipulation attacks.
Controlled Decoding Attacks on Black-Box LLMs
arXiv:2609.36956v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Manipulating next-token probabilities during generation can bypass the safety alignment of large language models. Existing approaches, however, rely on access to model weights or numerical token probabilities and therefore do not apply to interfaces that return only sampled text. Reconstructing probabilities from sampled outputs offers a possible alternative, but finite sampling produces sparse and noisy estimates, while repeating this process at every generation step incurs substantial query costs. Our empirical observations suggest that large distributional changes along successful jailbreak trajectories are concentrated at a small subset of positions, motivating selective control. We introduce \method{}, a framework for jailbreaking through text-only continuation interfaces that permit repeated sampling and assistant-prefix continuation. Sample-Based Distribution Reconstruction combines sampled outputs with a prior over unobserved actions to obtain a usable control signal. Risk-Gated Residual Control uses the evolving response prefix to decide when to reconstruct and modify the distribution, concentrating sampling costs at selected positions. Speculative Multi-Token Execution further amortizes target calls by verifying and accepting draft prefixes that require no intervention. Across four target endpoints and three benchmarks, \method{} achieves the highest mean score most comparisons against baselines.
Abstract:Manipulating next-token probabilities during generation can bypass the safety alignment of large language models. Existing approaches, however, rely on access to model weights or numerical token probabilities and therefore do not apply to interfaces that return only sampled text. Reconstructing probabilities from sampled outputs offers a possible alternative, but finite sampling produces sparse and noisy estimates, while repeating this process at every generation step incurs substantial query costs. Our empirical observations suggest that large distributional changes along successful jailbreak trajectories are concentrated at a small subset of positions, motivating selective control. We introduce \method{}, a framework for jailbreaking through text-only continuation interfaces that permit repeated sampling and assistant-prefix continuation. Sample-Based Distribution Reconstruction combines sampled outputs with a prior over unobserved actions to obtain a usable control signal. Risk-Gated Residual Control uses the evolving response prefix to decide when to reconstruct and modify the distribution, concentrating sampling costs at selected positions. Speculative Multi-Token Execution further amortizes target calls by verifying and accepting draft prefixes that require no intervention. Across four target endpoints and three benchmarks, \method{} achieves the highest mean score most comparisons against baselines.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.36956 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2609.36956v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36956 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words
Related coverage
DYNASHIELD: A Black-Box Moving Target Defense for LLMs via Dynamic Decoding Customization
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Can Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince save the web from AI?
The Verge · Sep 26, 2026

Infected Vibe-Coding: How Does an AI react to a Prompt Injection from a Different AI?
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026