Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research advances Graph Neural Network interpretability by optimizing explanations across fidelity, sparsity, stability, and motif familiarity simultaneously. By treating the relative weighting of these metrics as a control variable, the method offers greater flexibility for high-stakes applications where trust and bias mitigation are paramount. The study further demonstrates how domain-specific motif libraries can guide explanation generation to improve output quality.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Controllable GNN Explanations via Multi-Metric Preference Selection

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.32436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mechanisms for generating GNN explanations are crucial for building trust and mitigating biases in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), especially in high-stakes scenarios. Most current methods optimize only for fidelity under the sparsity constraint. However, this discounts the need for interpretable explanations (those that consist of familiar motif patterns) and stable explanations (those that remain unchanged under structural perturbations). We propose a novel approach that optimizes GNN explanations across these metrics, exposing their relative weighing as a control. Experiments on various real-world datasets, including MUTAG, BA-2Motif, BAMultiShapes, and PROTEINS, suggest that our method produces higher-fidelity explanations than a state-of-the-art baseline on MUTAG and PROTEINS across all evaluated budgets, and on BA-2Motif at larger budgets, while being faster in the regime of small explanation budgets. We also explore how, given an input motif library containing standard motifs for the corresponding domain, the method can be used to determine the relative importance of those motifs in generating the explanations, and how this information can be used to further improve the quality of the output explanations. We also examine the relationship between different metrics through their induced tradeoff surface, and explore its dependence on the nature of the motif library.

Abstract:Mechanisms for generating GNN explanations are crucial for building trust and mitigating biases in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), especially in high-stakes scenarios. Most current methods optimize only for fidelity under the sparsity constraint. However, this discounts the need for interpretable explanations (those that consist of familiar motif patterns) and stable explanations (those that remain unchanged under structural perturbations). We propose a novel approach that optimizes GNN explanations across these metrics, exposing their relative weighing as a control. Experiments on various real-world datasets, including MUTAG, BA-2Motif, BAMultiShapes, and PROTEINS, suggest that our method produces higher-fidelity explanations than a state-of-the-art baseline on MUTAG and PROTEINS across all evaluated budgets, and on BA-2Motif at larger budgets, while being faster in the regime of small explanation budgets. We also explore how, given an input motif library containing standard motifs for the corresponding domain, the method can be used to determine the relative importance of those motifs in generating the explanations, and how this information can be used to further improve the quality of the output explanations. We also examine the relationship between different metrics through their induced tradeoff surface, and explore its dependence on the nature of the motif library.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.32436 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.32436v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32436 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words

Related coverage