aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces "Contribution Weights," a metric that improves upon standard attention analysis by incorporating the geometric properties of value vectors, such as magnitude and directional alignment. The authors demonstrate that this approach more accurately identifies semantically critical tokens and reveals that attention sinks actively stabilize model representations rather than merely storing excess attention. For practitioners focused on model interpretability and mechanistic analysis, this work offers a more faithful tool for diagnosing token importance and understanding internal model dynamics.
Contribution Weights: A Geometrical Analysis of Self-Attention Transformers
arXiv:2606.07604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Analyzing attention weights has become a standard approach for interpreting the information flow of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, this approach has significant limitations as it neglects the geometric properties of the value vectors being aggregated. To address this gap, we introduce \emph{Contribution Weights}, a projection-based metric that quantifies a token's influence by accounting for it's attention weight, value magnitude, and directional alignment with the layer output. We demonstrate that contribution weights provide a more faithful measure of token importance, consistently outperforming attention-based metrics in identifying semantically critical tokens across different decoder-only models, tasks, and datasets. Further, our metric enables novel mechanistic analysis of \emph{attention sinks}. While previous work characterized sinks as passive repositories for excess attention, we reveal they serve an active functional role, suppressing information through a convex relationship between sink rate and output norm, stabilizing representations by opposing the semantic drift of low-confidence tokens.
Abstract:Analyzing attention weights has become a standard approach for interpreting the information flow of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, this approach has significant limitations as it neglects the geometric properties of the value vectors being aggregated. To address this gap, we introduce \emph{Contribution Weights}, a projection-based metric that quantifies a token's influence by accounting for it's attention weight, value magnitude, and directional alignment with the layer output. We demonstrate that contribution weights provide a more faithful measure of token importance, consistently outperforming attention-based metrics in identifying semantically critical tokens across different decoder-only models, tasks, and datasets. Further, our metric enables novel mechanistic analysis of \emph{attention sinks}. While previous work characterized sinks as passive repositories for excess attention, we reveal they serve an active functional role, suppressing information through a convex relationship between sink rate and output norm, stabilizing representations by opposing the semantic drift of low-confidence tokens.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.07604 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.07604v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07604 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 244 words
Related coverage

[AINews] DeepSeek v4.1-Flash: 763B-P8B-D16B novel causal Encoder–Decoder architecture with vision marks the Return of the Whale
Latent Space · Sep 12, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026