aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses a critical challenge in deploying autonomous agents by formalizing contract design within Markov Decision Processes where the agent operates under model mismatch. It provides a theoretical framework for principals to incentivize desirable long-term outcomes despite the agent's inaccurate understanding of environmental dynamics, directly advancing robust AI alignment and decision-making theory.
Contracting with an Agent under Model Mismatch
arXiv:2610.23402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In the classical principal-agent setting, the principal delegates some task to the agent, who receives a payment conditioned on the outcome of the task, which in turn benefits the principal. To align their objectives, the principal designs a contract that incentivizes the agent to take actions beneficial to the principal. In practice, however, the agent may act under misspecified beliefs about the underlying environment, leading to systematically suboptimal decisions. In this work, we study this problem through a principal-agent Markov Decision Process (PAMDP), in which the principal repeatedly interacts with an agent whose transition model may differ from the true environment dynamics. The principal has access to the true transition model and designs contracts that account for the agent's belief and incentives. We characterize contract design under model mismatch and develop a framework that enables the principal to induce desirable long-term benefits even though the agent has a potentially inaccurate understanding of the environment.
Abstract:In the classical principal-agent setting, the principal delegates some task to the agent, who receives a payment conditioned on the outcome of the task, which in turn benefits the principal. To align their objectives, the principal designs a contract that incentivizes the agent to take actions beneficial to the principal. In practice, however, the agent may act under misspecified beliefs about the underlying environment, leading to systematically suboptimal decisions. In this work, we study this problem through a principal-agent Markov Decision Process (PAMDP), in which the principal repeatedly interacts with an agent whose transition model may differ from the true environment dynamics. The principal has access to the true transition model and designs contracts that account for the agent's belief and incentives. We characterize contract design under model mismatch and develop a framework that enables the principal to induce desirable long-term benefits even though the agent has a potentially inaccurate understanding of the environment.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
arXiv:2610.23402 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.23402v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.23402 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words
Related coverage

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026
Evaluating Agents Across Runtime Contracts: When Mismatch Costs Efficiency or Quality
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026

Article: The Platform Engineering Playbook for Production LLMs
InfoQ · Oct 5, 2026

Run agent-driven Amazon SageMaker HyperPod operations with InstantStart
AWS · Sep 4, 2026