aiqbench analysis
This research addresses critical bottlenecks in adapting pretrained diffusion and flow models to new domains, specifically targeting the inefficiency of multi-step sampling and the limitations of existing adversarial refinement methods. By unifying model adaptation with acceleration in a single loop and extending adversarial techniques to finite-interval average velocities, the proposed MeanFlow-Transfer and Continuous Adversarial MeanFlow frameworks significantly reduce computational costs while improving image generation quality.
Continuous Adversarial MeanFlow Transfer
arXiv:2608.19540v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training fast generators on new domains with limited data remains challenging for two reasons. First, adapting a pretrained diffusion or flow model to a new domain leaves its costly multi-step sampling unaddressed, and existing acceleration methods are tied to the source parameterization--$\epsilon$, $x$, $v$, or $u$--leaving heterogeneous pretrained models with no common acceleration target. Second, while adversarial refinement is proven effective for few-step quality, it is formulated only for instantaneous-velocity flows, not for the finite-interval average velocities that MeanFlow (MF) models predict. We address both problems. We propose MeanFlow-Transfer, which maps heterogeneous source outputs into a shared velocity representation, uses it to initialize an MF generator from the source weights, and optimizes an MF objective on the target domain. This unifies adaptation and acceleration in a single training loop across a broad range of pretrained models. We then introduce Continuous Adversarial MeanFlow, a post-training stage that extends continuous adversarial flow models from instantaneous velocities to MF's finite-interval average velocities. CAMF contrasts changes in a learned potential between real and predicted interval endpoints, recovering fine detail that MF regression averages away, and reduces to the instantaneous criterion in the vanishing-interval limit. Adapting four ImageNet-based source models--DiT ($\epsilon$), SiT ($v$), JiT ($x$), iMF ($u$)--to five target domains, MF-T with CAMF matches or exceeds the fine-tuned teacher in FID and FDD at up to $125\times$ fewer Neural Function Evaluations (NFEs), while CAMF improves MF-T's few-step FID by $29\%$ on average.
Abstract:Training fast generators on new domains with limited data remains challenging for two reasons. First, adapting a pretrained diffusion or flow model to a new domain leaves its costly multi-step sampling unaddressed, and existing acceleration methods are tied to the source parameterization--$\epsilon$, $x$, $v$, or $u$--leaving heterogeneous pretrained models with no common acceleration target. Second, while adversarial refinement is proven effective for few-step quality, it is formulated only for instantaneous-velocity flows, not for the finite-interval average velocities that MeanFlow (MF) models predict. We address both problems. We propose MeanFlow-Transfer, which maps heterogeneous source outputs into a shared velocity representation, uses it to initialize an MF generator from the source weights, and optimizes an MF objective on the target domain. This unifies adaptation and acceleration in a single training loop across a broad range of pretrained models. We then introduce Continuous Adversarial MeanFlow, a post-training stage that extends continuous adversarial flow models from instantaneous velocities to MF's finite-interval average velocities. CAMF contrasts changes in a learned potential between real and predicted interval endpoints, recovering fine detail that MF regression averages away, and reduces to the instantaneous criterion in the vanishing-interval limit. Adapting four ImageNet-based source models--DiT ($\epsilon$), SiT ($v$), JiT ($x$), iMF ($u$)--to five target domains, MF-T with CAMF matches or exceeds the fine-tuned teacher in FID and FDD at up to $125\times$ fewer Neural Function Evaluations (NFEs), while CAMF improves MF-T's few-step FID by $29\%$ on average.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2608.19540 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.19540v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19540 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
Related coverage
Exploring Adversarial Robustness and Safety Alignment in Multilingual Multi-Modal Large Language Models
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026
CARD: Closing the Teacher-Student Loop for Adversarial Robustness Distillation
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
[Paper] Distillation for Incrimination and Distillation for Capabilities
LessWrong · Oct 9, 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026