aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical gap in AI safety by demonstrating that Large Language Models struggle to accurately grade the sensitivity of health data without full contextual nuance, often misclassifying negated or hypothetical conditions as confirmed disclosures. The study establishes a rigorous framework for evaluating how assertion status and uncertainty impact privacy risks in online medical dialogues, providing essential benchmarks for deploying reliable LLMs in healthcare settings.
Context-Aware Classification and Grading of Sensitive Information in Online Conversational Health Data
arXiv:2601.09717v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Online medical consultations contain sensitive health information whose privacy implications depend not only on the entities mentioned but also on how those entities are described in context. Existing classification and grading approaches often map health-information entities directly to predefined sensitivity levels, potentially overlooking whether a condition is confirmed, suspected, negated, hypothetical, or merely planned for investigation. In this study, we formulate sensitive-information grading in online medical dialogues as a context-aware evaluation task. We develop a standard-informed operational framework that incorporates assertion status, experiencer, test-result status, and information granularity. We further design a naturalistic evaluation setting together with contrastive cases that minimally alter negation, uncertainty, experiencer, or granularity, and compare large language models under mention-only and full-context conditions. The study aims to quantify the contribution of contextual information to sensitivity grading and to characterize safety-critical over- and under-grading errors. Our framework provides a reproducible basis for evaluating whether LLMs can distinguish sensitive entity mentions from contextually established sensitive disclosures.
Abstract:Online medical consultations contain sensitive health information whose privacy implications depend not only on the entities mentioned but also on how those entities are described in context. Existing classification and grading approaches often map health-information entities directly to predefined sensitivity levels, potentially overlooking whether a condition is confirmed, suspected, negated, hypothetical, or merely planned for investigation. In this study, we formulate sensitive-information grading in online medical dialogues as a context-aware evaluation task. We develop a standard-informed operational framework that incorporates assertion status, experiencer, test-result status, and information granularity. We further design a naturalistic evaluation setting together with contrastive cases that minimally alter negation, uncertainty, experiencer, or granularity, and compare large language models under mention-only and full-context conditions. The study aims to quantify the contribution of contextual information to sensitivity grading and to characterize safety-critical over- and under-grading errors. Our framework provides a reproducible basis for evaluating whether LLMs can distinguish sensitive entity mentions from contextually established sensitive disclosures.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2601.09717 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.09717v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.09717 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

Article: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Phishing: How Phishing Technique Is Evolving and Implemented
InfoQ · Jun 8, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026