Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses critical safety vulnerabilities in LLM-driven multi-robot fleets, demonstrating how semantic manipulation can trigger cascading operational failures like congestion and replanning errors. The authors propose a structured "Verify-Adapt-Hold" framework that treats post-compromise verification as a team-level planning problem to effectively contain these physical consequences before they propagate across the entire system.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Containing Behavioral Cascades from Manipulated Claims in LLM-Powered Multi-Robot Systems

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.30523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-powered multi-robot systems are vulnerable to semantic manipulation: an accepted false world-state claim can trigger a fleet-wide behavioral cascade, causing unnecessary replanning, increased path costs, congestion, or apparent mission infeasibility. Conditioning on a successful manipulation, we propose an active verification framework that contains its downstream effects before they propagate across the fleet. A dedicated verification module generates a structured Verify-Adapt-Hold plan: selected robots inspect consequential regions, a limited subset provisionally adapts when necessary, and the remaining robots retain their trusted plans. We evaluate the framework in a multi-robot transportation environment using injected false obstacle claims across different impacts and team sizes. Evaluation measures cascade containment, Sum-of-Costs, makespan, and coverage ratio. Results show that treating post-compromise verification as a team-level planning problem, rather than a binary trust decision, effectively limits the cascading physical consequences of semantic manipulation.

Abstract:Large language model (LLM)-powered multi-robot systems are vulnerable to semantic manipulation: an accepted false world-state claim can trigger a fleet-wide behavioral cascade, causing unnecessary replanning, increased path costs, congestion, or apparent mission infeasibility. Conditioning on a successful manipulation, we propose an active verification framework that contains its downstream effects before they propagate across the fleet. A dedicated verification module generates a structured Verify-Adapt-Hold plan: selected robots inspect consequential regions, a limited subset provisionally adapts when necessary, and the remaining robots retain their trusted plans. We evaluate the framework in a multi-robot transportation environment using injected false obstacle claims across different impacts and team sizes. Evaluation measures cascade containment, Sum-of-Costs, makespan, and coverage ratio. Results show that treating post-compromise verification as a team-level planning problem, rather than a binary trust decision, effectively limits the cascading physical consequences of semantic manipulation.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.30523 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.30523v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30523 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 232 words

Related coverage