aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Constraint-Driven Context Engineering (CDCE), a framework that treats regulatory, technical, and normative limits as primary design drivers rather than afterthoughts in generative AI deployment. By integrating Domain-Driven Design principles, the approach systematically structures context assets to ensure AI outputs remain within permissible boundaries across sectors like healthcare and finance. This methodology addresses a critical gap where current solutions often prioritize raw domain knowledge over the operational constraints that define acceptable behavior.
Constraint-Driven Context Engineering: Designing Domain Interfaces for AI Systems
arXiv:2609.27354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI systems are increasingly deployed to address domain problems. These systems operate under technical, regulatory, institutional, and normative constraints that define acceptable AI behaviour and outcomes within their domains. We observe a recurring pattern in our industry engagement: partners often arrive with a functioning but relatively generic AI solution. The challenge is no longer to build an AI system from scratch, but to improve the quality and domain appropriateness of an AI-generated solution. In these settings, the limiting factor is often the quality, scope, and structure of the context available to the system. Yet, existing context engineering approaches primarily focus on supplying domain knowledge through retrieval, memory, and tools, with limited support for systematically identifying and operationalising the constraints that govern AI systems in their operational environments. This paper proposes Constraint-Driven Context Engineering (CDCE), a design approach for engineering domain interfaces for AI systems. Drawing on software architecture design and Domain-Driven Design (DDD), CDCE treats domain constraints as first-class design drivers. It identifies and characterises constraints, determines the required context assets, and designs representations through which these assets are made available to AI systems. We conducted a comparative multiple-case study with industry and public-sector partners across educational assessment, healthcare decision support, and financial-distress prediction. Depending on their characteristics, constraints can guide AI behaviour, enforce permissible boundaries, or support verification of AI-generated outcomes. The cases demonstrate CDCE's applicability across contrasting domains and show how constraint characteristics shape the resulting domain interfaces.
Abstract:Generative AI systems are increasingly deployed to address domain problems. These systems operate under technical, regulatory, institutional, and normative constraints that define acceptable AI behaviour and outcomes within their domains. We observe a recurring pattern in our industry engagement: partners often arrive with a functioning but relatively generic AI solution. The challenge is no longer to build an AI system from scratch, but to improve the quality and domain appropriateness of an AI-generated solution. In these settings, the limiting factor is often the quality, scope, and structure of the context available to the system. Yet, existing context engineering approaches primarily focus on supplying domain knowledge through retrieval, memory, and tools, with limited support for systematically identifying and operationalising the constraints that govern AI systems in their operational environments. This paper proposes Constraint-Driven Context Engineering (CDCE), a design approach for engineering domain interfaces for AI systems. Drawing on software architecture design and Domain-Driven Design (DDD), CDCE treats domain constraints as first-class design drivers. It identifies and characterises constraints, determines the required context assets, and designs representations through which these assets are made available to AI systems. We conducted a comparative multiple-case study with industry and public-sector partners across educational assessment, healthcare decision support, and financial-distress prediction. Depending on their characteristics, constraints can guide AI behaviour, enforce permissible boundaries, or support verification of AI-generated outcomes. The cases demonstrate CDCE's applicability across contrasting domains and show how constraint characteristics shape the resulting domain interfaces.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.27354 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2609.27354v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27354 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 338 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Claude Code’s Next Era — Thariq Shihipar, Anthropic
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

Article: Multi-Agent AI for Production Security Operations: an A2A and MCP Architecture in a 5G Core
InfoQ · Jul 23, 2026

Inside NVIDIA Rubin GPU Architecture: Powering the Era of Agentic AI
NVIDIA · Jul 21, 2026