Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Constraining Lorentz Invariance Violation via Precision Atomic Spectroscopy
arXiv:2611.06392v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper investigates Lorentz violation arising from quantum gravity effects in electronic and muonic hydrogen atoms. The violation is modeled through a modified dispersion relation parameterized by a dimensionless coefficient $\xi$ and suppressed by the Planck scale. Using high-precision spectroscopic data and a chi-squared fitting procedure that carefully accounts for theoretical uncertainties in the Rydberg constant and the proton radius, the analysis yields a 95% confidence level constraint $\xi \in [-14.3,\; 1.37] \times 10^5$. The mass scaling of the effect reveals two distinct regimes: for the lowest-order deformation, the heavy nucleus amplifies the signal, while for higher-order corrections, the lepton dominates the sensitivity. These bounds approach Planck-scale sensitivity using the simplest atomic systems, thereby circumventing ambiguities inherent in more complex quantum systems.
Abstract:This paper investigates Lorentz violation arising from quantum gravity effects in electronic and muonic hydrogen atoms. The violation is modeled through a modified dispersion relation parameterized by a dimensionless coefficient $\xi$ and suppressed by the Planck scale. Using high-precision spectroscopic data and a chi-squared fitting procedure that carefully accounts for theoretical uncertainties in the Rydberg constant and the proton radius, the analysis yields a 95% confidence level constraint $\xi \in [-14.3,\; 1.37] \times 10^5$. The mass scaling of the effect reveals two distinct regimes: for the lowest-order deformation, the heavy nucleus amplifies the signal, while for higher-order corrections, the lepton dominates the sensitivity. These bounds approach Planck-scale sensitivity using the simplest atomic systems, thereby circumventing ambiguities inherent in more complex quantum systems.
arXiv:2611.06392 [gr-qc]
(or arXiv:2611.06392v1 [gr-qc] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06392 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 213 words
Related coverage
Quantum Ghost Spectroscopy Reveals Hidden Electronic Coherence in Molecular Aggregates
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
ChemGraph-XANES: An Agentic Framework for XANES Simulation and Curation
arXiv · Aug 24, 2026
Direct characterization of classical dephasing noise for a qubit
arXiv · Sep 23, 2026

Entangled Photons Boost Infrared Spectroscopy Signals by 21.8×
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 22, 2026