aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a fundamental operational boundary in quantum foundations by proving that multiple consistent local descriptions of spacetime events do not necessarily imply the existence of a single global underlying process. The study provides rigorous mathematical criteria, including specific visibility thresholds and interferometric witnesses, to distinguish between setting-wise realizability and common-process consistency without relying on causally agnostic assumptions. These findings advance our understanding of relational quantum mechanics and offer practical frameworks for testing the limits of standard-quantum processes in complex causal orders.
Consistent Quantum States over Spacetime without a Common Quantum Process
arXiv:2607.25899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Determining whether multiple record-conditioned quantum descriptions admit a single underlying process is a central consistency problem for quantum states over spacetime (QSOSTs) and relational quantum descriptions. Yet causally agnostic interferometry accesses only a lower-dimensional QSOST projection, which inevitably leaves some process degrees of freedom unresolved. We combine branch-resolved QSOST interferometry with positive-process lifting and semidefinite convex duality to characterize this gluing problem. We prove that every positive-weight QSOST branch has a unique least positive lift and reduce both settingwise and common-process realizability to deterministic-process domination. Using this criterion, we construct a minimal bipartite-qubit example with two record settings and two outcomes in the definite causal order $A\prec B$: each setting is separately realizable, and both share the same complete unconditional QSOST, yet no single deterministic process realizes them jointly. The separation has the exact visibility threshold $\eta =1/\sqrt{2}$ , admits a sparse witness involving eight interferometric quadratures, and persists for full-rank processes. These results establish an operational boundary between QSOST consistency and global process consistency, and provide a practical framework for testing whether multiple quantum perspectives can share one standard-quantum process.
Abstract:Determining whether multiple record-conditioned quantum descriptions admit a single underlying process is a central consistency problem for quantum states over spacetime (QSOSTs) and relational quantum descriptions. Yet causally agnostic interferometry accesses only a lower-dimensional QSOST projection, which inevitably leaves some process degrees of freedom unresolved. We combine branch-resolved QSOST interferometry with positive-process lifting and semidefinite convex duality to characterize this gluing problem. We prove that every positive-weight QSOST branch has a unique least positive lift and reduce both settingwise and common-process realizability to deterministic-process domination. Using this criterion, we construct a minimal bipartite-qubit example with two record settings and two outcomes in the definite causal order $A\prec B$: each setting is separately realizable, and both share the same complete unconditional QSOST, yet no single deterministic process realizes them jointly. The separation has the exact visibility threshold $\eta =1/\sqrt{2}$ , admits a sparse witness involving eight interferometric quadratures, and persists for full-rank processes. These results establish an operational boundary between QSOST consistency and global process consistency, and provide a practical framework for testing whether multiple quantum perspectives can share one standard-quantum process.
arXiv:2607.25899 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2607.25899v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25899 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage

Researchers Propose Algorithm to Rebuild Fluid Flows from Limited Data
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 5, 2026

Voyager Homecoming TPB: Triplex DNA and CAP Theorem Make Borg Personhood Math
techtimes.com · Aug 19, 2026
Genuine Global Kochen-Specker Contextuality as Classical Coordination Cost
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026