aiqbench analysis
This research introduces "consideration circuits," a novel architecture for multi-stage choice modeling that utilizes directed acyclic graphs of multinomial logit units rather than standard single-softmax outputs. The study demonstrates a significant theoretical advantage where increasing circuit depth from two to three drastically improves approximation efficiency and reduces the norm required to minimize error, outperforming conventional random-utility models on fixed-pool benchmarks.
Consideration Circuits: Depth Separation and Universality Beyond a Single Softmax
arXiv:2610.04143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most feature-based choice models, classical and deep, score items and apply a single softmax. We introduce consideration circuits (CC), feature-based models of multi-stage choice defined by directed acyclic graphs of multinomial logit (MNL) units. Source units assign probabilities to menu items, and internal units combine predecessor distributions using MNL weights computed from their probability-weighted feature summaries. On a three-item compromise task with fixed non-collinear features, menu-independent random-utility models (RUM), including a single MNL unit, suffer an error bounded away from zero. For CC, in contrast, we establish a sharp depth--norm separation: increasing depth from $2$ to $3$ reduces the optimal maximum taste-vector norm for error $\epsilon$ from $\Theta(\log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon)$ to $\Theta(\log(1/\epsilon))$. The depth-$2$ lower bound holds for arbitrary width and menu-independent routing biases, while a five-node depth-$3$ circuit with zero routing biases attains the logarithmic rate. More generally, we characterize two geometric conditions that are necessary and sufficient for approximating arbitrary deterministic choice tables on finite menu families. Under these conditions, depth $3$ suffices, while depth $4$ achieves optimal logarithmic norm scaling whenever the family contains a non-singleton menu. In experiments, standalone tree circuits with fewer than $600$ parameters attain the lowest mean test negative log-likelihood (NLL) among the evaluated models on four fixed-pool benchmarks and the Expedia temporal split. As output heads, CC generalize the linear MNL readout and lower mean test NLL for every tested encoder on Expedia and Trivago.
Abstract:Most feature-based choice models, classical and deep, score items and apply a single softmax. We introduce consideration circuits (CC), feature-based models of multi-stage choice defined by directed acyclic graphs of multinomial logit (MNL) units. Source units assign probabilities to menu items, and internal units combine predecessor distributions using MNL weights computed from their probability-weighted feature summaries. On a three-item compromise task with fixed non-collinear features, menu-independent random-utility models (RUM), including a single MNL unit, suffer an error bounded away from zero. For CC, in contrast, we establish a sharp depth--norm separation: increasing depth from $2$ to $3$ reduces the optimal maximum taste-vector norm for error $\epsilon$ from $\Theta(\log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon)$ to $\Theta(\log(1/\epsilon))$. The depth-$2$ lower bound holds for arbitrary width and menu-independent routing biases, while a five-node depth-$3$ circuit with zero routing biases attains the logarithmic rate. More generally, we characterize two geometric conditions that are necessary and sufficient for approximating arbitrary deterministic choice tables on finite menu families. Under these conditions, depth $3$ suffices, while depth $4$ achieves optimal logarithmic norm scaling whenever the family contains a non-singleton menu. In experiments, standalone tree circuits with fewer than $600$ parameters attain the lowest mean test negative log-likelihood (NLL) among the evaluated models on four fixed-pool benchmarks and the Expedia temporal split. As output heads, CC generalize the linear MNL readout and lower mean test NLL for every tested encoder on Expedia and Trivago.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.04143 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.04143v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04143 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 328 words
Related coverage

IBM Computing Legacy, The Complete Story From 1890 To Quantum Computing
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 3, 2026

Northwestern Proves Quantum Internet Can Share Existing Telecom Fiber Over 15 Miles at 94 % Fidelity
techtimes.com · Jul 26, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026